Literature DB >> 26283382

Mechanobiological oscillators control lymph flow.

Christian Kunert1, James W Baish2, Shan Liao3, Timothy P Padera3, Lance L Munn3.   

Abstract

The ability of cells to sense and respond to physical forces has been recognized for decades, but researchers are only beginning to appreciate the fundamental importance of mechanical signals in biology. At the larger scale, there has been increased interest in the collective organization of cells and their ability to produce complex, "emergent" behaviors. Often, these complex behaviors result in tissue-level control mechanisms that manifest as biological oscillators, such as observed in fireflies, heartbeats, and circadian rhythms. In many cases, these complex, collective behaviors are controlled--at least in part--by physical forces imposed on the tissue or created by the cells. Here, we use mathematical simulations to show that two complementary mechanobiological oscillators are sufficient to control fluid transport in the lymphatic system: Ca(2+)-mediated contractions can be triggered by vessel stretch, whereas nitric oxide produced in response to the resulting fluid shear stress causes the lymphatic vessel to relax locally. Our model predicts that the Ca(2+) and NO levels alternate spatiotemporally, establishing complementary feedback loops, and that the resulting phasic contractions drive lymph flow. We show that this mechanism is self-regulating and robust over a range of fluid pressure environments, allowing the lymphatic vessels to provide pumping when needed but remain open when flow can be driven by tissue pressure or gravity. Our simulations accurately reproduce the responses to pressure challenges and signaling pathway manipulations observed experimentally, providing an integrated conceptual framework for lymphatic function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological oscillator; computational model; control; lymphatic; mechanobiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26283382      PMCID: PMC4568261          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508330112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  73 in total

1.  Micromanipulation of pressure in terminal lymphatics in the mesentery.

Authors:  B W Zweifach; J W Prather
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1975-05

Review 2.  Physiologic aspects of lymphatic contractile function: current perspectives.

Authors:  Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Myogenic constriction and dilation of isolated lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Ann M Davis; Christine W Ku; Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Single stretch-activated ion channels in vascular endothelial cells as mechanotransducers?

Authors:  J B Lansman; T J Hallam; T J Rink
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Feb 26-Mar 4       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The effect of transmural pressure on pumping activity in isolated bovine lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  N G McHale; I C Roddie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice.

Authors:  Sanjeev S Ranade; Zhaozhu Qiu; Seung-Hyun Woo; Sung Sik Hur; Swetha E Murthy; Stuart M Cahalan; Jie Xu; Jayanti Mathur; Michael Bandell; Bertrand Coste; Yi-Shuan J Li; Shu Chien; Ardem Patapoutian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inhibition of the active lymph pump by flow in rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic duct.

Authors:  Anatoliy A Gashev; Michael J Davis; David C Zawieja
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Incorporating measured valve properties into a numerical model of a lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; J E Moore
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.763

9.  A mathematical model of Ca2+ dynamics in rat mesenteric smooth muscle cell: agonist and NO stimulation.

Authors:  Adam Kapela; Anastasios Bezerianos; Nikolaos M Tsoukias
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  The biological lifetime of nitric oxide: implications for the perivascular dynamics of NO and O2.

Authors:  D D Thomas; X Liu; S P Kantrow; J R Lancaster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  35 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic shear and transmural pressure on wall shear stress sensitivity in collecting lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kornuta; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Olga Y Gasheva; Anish Mukherjee; David C Zawieja; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Reply to Davis: Nitric oxide regulates lymphatic contractions.

Authors:  Christian Kunert; James W Baish; Shan Liao; Timothy P Padera; Lance L Munn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Is nitric oxide important for the diastolic phase of the lymphatic contraction/relaxation cycle?

Authors:  Michael J Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.

Authors:  Christopher D Bertram; Charlie Macaskill; Michael J Davis; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Inhibition of contraction strength and frequency by wall shear stress in a single-lymphangion model.

Authors:  C D Bertram; Charles Macaskill; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 7.  New diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of lymphedema.

Authors:  Thomas F O'Donnell; John C Rasmussen; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2017-01-16

Review 8.  Application of microscale culture technologies for studying lymphatic vessel biology.

Authors:  Chia-Wen Chang; Alex J Seibel; Jonathan W Song
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Contraction of collecting lymphatics: organization of pressure-dependent rate for multiple lymphangions.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; M J Davis; J E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-06-08

Review 10.  Beyond a Passive Conduit: Implications of Lymphatic Biology for Kidney Diseases.

Authors:  Daniyal J Jafree; David A Long
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.