Literature DB >> 20601461

Nonlinear lymphangion pressure-volume relationship minimizes edema.

Arun M Venugopal1, Randolph H Stewart, Glen A Laine, Christopher M Quick.   

Abstract

Lymphangions, the segments of lymphatic vessel between two valves, contract cyclically and actively pump, analogous to cardiac ventricles. Besides having a discernable systole and diastole, lymphangions have a relatively linear end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (with slope E(max)) and a nonlinear end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (with slope E(min)). To counter increased microvascular filtration (causing increased lymphatic inlet pressure), lymphangions must respond to modest increases in transmural pressure by increasing pumping. To counter venous hypertension (causing increased lymphatic inlet and outlet pressures), lymphangions must respond to potentially large increases in transmural pressure by maintaining lymph flow. We therefore hypothesized that the nonlinear lymphangion pressure-volume relationship allows transition from a transmural pressure-dependent stroke volume to a transmural pressure-independent stroke volume as transmural pressure increases. To test this hypothesis, we applied a mathematical model based on the time-varying elastance concept typically applied to ventricles (the ratio of pressure to volume cycles periodically from a minimum, E(min), to a maximum, E(max)). This model predicted that lymphangions increase stroke volume and stroke work with transmural pressure if E(min) < E(max) at low transmural pressures, but maintain stroke volume and stroke work if E(min)= E(max) at higher transmural pressures. Furthermore, at higher transmural pressures, stroke work is evenly distributed among a chain of lymphangions. Model predictions were tested by comparison to previously reported data. Model predictions were consistent with reported lymphangion properties and pressure-flow relationships of entire lymphatic systems. The nonlinear lymphangion pressure-volume relationship therefore minimizes edema resulting from both increased microvascular filtration and venous hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601461      PMCID: PMC2944481          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00239.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  31 in total

1.  Effect of increased neck vein pressure on intestinal lymphatic pressure in awake sheep.

Authors:  R E Drake; R D Abbott
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-05

2.  Intrinsic pump-conduit behavior of lymphangions.

Authors:  Christopher M Quick; Arun M Venugopal; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; Randolph H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Measuring microlymphatic flow using fast video microscopy.

Authors:  J Brandon Dixon; David C Zawieja; Anatoliy A Gashev; Gerard L Coté
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Lymph flow, shear stress, and lymphocyte velocity in rat mesenteric prenodal lymphatics.

Authors:  J Brandon Dixon; Steven T Greiner; Anatoliy A Gashev; Gerard L Cote; James E Moore; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2006 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  First-order approximation for the pressure-flow relationship of spontaneously contracting lymphangions.

Authors:  Christopher M Quick; Arun M Venugopal; Ranjeet M Dongaonkar; Glen A Laine; Randolph H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Lymphangion coordination minimally affects mean flow in lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Arun M Venugopal; Randolph H Stewart; Glen A Laine; Ranjeet M Dongaonkar; Christopher M Quick
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Active lymphatic pumping and sheep lung lymph flow.

Authors:  R E Drake; D Weiss; J C Gabel
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1991-07

8.  Pressure-volume relationships in sheep mesenteric lymphatic vessels in situ: response to hypovolemia.

Authors:  B Li; I Silver; J P Szalai; M G Johnston
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.514

9.  Importance of valves and lymphangion contractions in determining pressure gradients in isolated lymphatics exposed to elevations in outflow pressure.

Authors:  J Eisenhoffer; A Kagal; T Klein; M G Johnston
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.514

10.  Distribution, propagation, and coordination of contractile activity in lymphatics.

Authors:  D C Zawieja; K L Davis; R Schuster; W M Hinds; H J Granger
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Passive pressure-diameter relationship and structural composition of rat mesenteric lymphangions.

Authors:  Elaheh Rahbar; Jon Weimer; Holly Gibbs; Alvin T Yeh; Christopher D Bertram; Michael J Davis; Michael A Hill; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.589

2.  Lymph transport in rat mesenteric lymphatics experiencing edemagenic stress.

Authors:  Elaheh Rahbar; Tony Akl; Gerard L Coté; James E Moore; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 3.  Modelling the lymphatic system: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  K N Margaris; R A Black
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  A multiscale sliding filament model of lymphatic muscle pumping.

Authors:  Christopher J Morris; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.