Literature DB >> 26333787

Effects of dynamic shear and transmural pressure on wall shear stress sensitivity in collecting lymphatic vessels.

Jeffrey A Kornuta1, Zhanna Nepiyushchikh1, Olga Y Gasheva2, Anish Mukherjee3, David C Zawieja2, J Brandon Dixon4.   

Abstract

Given the known mechanosensitivity of the lymphatic vasculature, we sought to investigate the effects of dynamic wall shear stress (WSS) on collecting lymphatic vessels while controlling for transmural pressure. Using a previously developed ex vivo lymphatic perfusion system (ELPS) capable of independently controlling both transaxial pressure gradient and average transmural pressure on an isolated lymphatic vessel, we imposed a multitude of flow conditions on rat thoracic ducts, while controlling for transmural pressure and measuring diameter changes. By gradually increasing the imposed flow through a vessel, we determined the WSS at which the vessel first shows sign of contraction inhibition, defining this point as the shear stress sensitivity of the vessel. The shear stress threshold that triggered a contractile response was significantly greater at a transmural pressure of 5 cmH2O (0.97 dyne/cm(2)) than at 3 cmH2O (0.64 dyne/cm(2)). While contraction frequency was reduced when a steady WSS was applied, this inhibition was reversed when the applied WSS oscillated, even though the mean wall shear stresses between the conditions were not significantly different. When the applied oscillatory WSS was large enough, flow itself synchronized the lymphatic contractions to the exact frequency of the applied waveform. Both transmural pressure and the rate of change of WSS have significant impacts on the contractile response of lymphatic vessels to flow. Specifically, time-varying shear stress can alter the inhibition of phasic contraction frequency and even coordinate contractions, providing evidence that dynamic shear could play an important role in the contractile function of collecting lymphatic vessels.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endothelial cell; lymphatic; pump function; shear stress; thoracic duct

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26333787      PMCID: PMC4666954          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00342.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  70 in total

1.  Effect of venous and lymphatic congestion on lymph capillary pressure of the skin in healthy volunteers and patients with lymph edema.

Authors:  S B Gretener; S Läuchli; A J Leu; R Koppensteiner; U K Franzeck
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.934

2.  The role of the microlymphatic valve in the propagation of spontaneous rhythmical lymphatic motion in rat.

Authors:  J Zhang; H Li; R Xiu
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The effect of transmural pressure on pumping activity in isolated bovine lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  N G McHale; I C Roddie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Measuring contraction propagation and localizing pacemaker cells using high speed video microscopy.

Authors:  Tony J Akl; Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; Gerard L Cot
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 5.  Lymphatic lipid transport: sewer or subway?

Authors:  J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 12.015

6.  Inhibition of the active lymph pump by flow in rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic duct.

Authors:  Anatoliy A Gashev; Michael J Davis; David C Zawieja
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Cyclic guanosine monophosphate and the dependent protein kinase regulate lymphatic contractility in rat thoracic duct.

Authors:  Olga Yu Gasheva; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The impact of baseline artery diameter on flow-mediated vasodilation: a comparison of brachial and radial artery responses to matched levels of shear stress.

Authors:  F Jazuli; K E Pyke
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  Estimating the population burden of lymphedema.

Authors:  Stanley G Rockson; Kahealani K Rivera
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Noninvasive quantitative imaging of lymph function in mice.

Authors:  Sunkuk Kwon; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.589

View more
  27 in total

1.  Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.

Authors:  Christopher D Bertram; Charlie Macaskill; Michael J Davis; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Inhibition of contraction strength and frequency by wall shear stress in a single-lymphangion model.

Authors:  C D Bertram; Charles Macaskill; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 regulates the directional migration of lymphatic endothelial cells in response to fluid shear stress.

Authors:  Vinay N Surya; Eleftheria Michalaki; Eva Y Huang; Gerald G Fuller; Alexander R Dunn
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Contraction of collecting lymphatics: organization of pressure-dependent rate for multiple lymphangions.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; M J Davis; J E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-06-08

6.  Lymphatic function measurements influenced by contrast agent volume and body position.

Authors:  Echoe M Bouta; Cedric Blatter; Thomas A Ruggieri; Eelco Fj Meijer; Lance L Munn; Benjamin J Vakoc; Timothy P Padera
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-01-25

7.  A Distinct Role of the Autonomic Nervous System in Modulating the Function of Lymphatic Vessels under Physiological and Tumor-Draining Conditions.

Authors:  Samia B Bachmann; Denise Gsponer; Javier A Montoya-Zegarra; Martin Schneider; Felix Scholkmann; Carlotta Tacconi; Simon F Noerrelykke; Steven T Proulx; Michael Detmar
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Nucleolin mediates the binding of cancer cells to L-selectin under conditions of lymphodynamic shear stress.

Authors:  Tovë M Goldson; Kevin L Turner; Yinan Huang; Grady E Carlson; Emily G Caggiano; Andres F Oberhauser; Susan M Fennewald; Monica M Burdick; Vicente A Resto
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.249

9.  Lymphatic remodelling in response to lymphatic injury in the hind limbs of sheep.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Joshua S T Hooks; Mohammad S Razavi; Tristan Lewis; Cristina C Clement; Merrilee Thoresen; Matthew T Cribb; Mindy K Ross; Rudolph L Gleason; Laura Santambrogio; John F Peroni; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 25.671

10.  Temporal Dynamics of the Rat Thoracic Duct Contractility in the Presence of Imposed Flow.

Authors:  Olga Yu Gasheva; Jerome P Trzeciakowski; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.