Literature DB >> 26747501

Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.

Christopher D Bertram1, Charlie Macaskill2, Michael J Davis3, James E Moore4.   

Abstract

The observed properties of valves in collecting lymphatic vessels include transmural pressure-dependent bias to the open state and hysteresis. The bias may reduce resistance to flow when the vessel is functioning as a conduit. However, lymphatic pumping implies a streamwise increase in mean pressure across each valve, suggesting that the bias is then potentially unhelpful. Lymph pumping by a model of several collecting lymphatic vessel segments (lymphangions) in series, which incorporated these properties, was investigated under conditions of adverse pressure difference while varying the refractory period between active muscular contractions and the inter-lymphangion contraction delay. It was found that many combinations of the timing parameters and the adverse pressure difference led to one or more intermediate valves remaining open instead of switching between open and closed states during repetitive contraction cycles. Cyclic valve switching was reliably indicated if the mean pressure in a lymphangion over a cycle was higher than that in the lymphangion upstream, but either lack of or very brief valve closure could cause mean pressure to be lower downstream. Widely separated combinations of refractory period and delay time were found to produce the greatest flow-rate for a given pressure difference. The efficiency of pumping was always maximized by a long refractory period and lymphangion contraction starting when the contraction of the lymphangion immediately upstream was peaking. By means of an ex vivo experiment, it was verified that intermediate valves in a chain of pumping lymphangions can remain open, while the lymphangions on either side of the open valve continue to execute contractions.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26747501      PMCID: PMC4867355          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00669.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  34 in total

1.  Length-tension relationships of small arteries, veins, and lymphatics from the rat mesenteric microcirculation.

Authors:  Rong-Zhen Zhang; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; Michael J Davis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Lymph flow, shear stress, and lymphocyte velocity in rat mesenteric prenodal lymphatics.

Authors:  J Brandon Dixon; Steven T Greiner; Anatoliy A Gashev; Gerard L Cote; James E Moore; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2006 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Lymphangion coordination minimally affects mean flow in lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Arun M Venugopal; Randolph H Stewart; Glen A Laine; Ranjeet M Dongaonkar; Christopher M Quick
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Confocal image-based computational modeling of nitric oxide transport in a rat mesenteric lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  John T Wilson; Wei Wang; Augustus H Hellerstedt; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Determinants of valve gating in collecting lymphatic vessels from rat mesentery.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Elaheh Rahbar; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Measuring contraction propagation and localizing pacemaker cells using high speed video microscopy.

Authors:  Tony J Akl; Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; Gerard L Cot
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Constriction of isolated collecting lymphatic vessels in response to acute increases in downstream pressure.

Authors:  Joshua P Scallan; John H Wolpers; Michael J Davis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Distribution, propagation, and coordination of contractile activity in lymphatics.

Authors:  D C Zawieja; K L Davis; R Schuster; W M Hinds; H J Granger
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-04

Review 9.  Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume.

Authors:  K Aukland; R K Reed
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Spontaneous transient depolarizations in lymphatic vessels of the guinea pig mesentery: pharmacology and implication for spontaneous contractility.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves von der Weid; Mozibur Rahman; Mohammad S Imtiaz; Dirk F van Helden
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  16 in total

1.  Inhibition of contraction strength and frequency by wall shear stress in a single-lymphangion model.

Authors:  C D Bertram; Charles Macaskill; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Contraction of collecting lymphatics: organization of pressure-dependent rate for multiple lymphangions.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; M J Davis; J E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-06-08

4.  Differences in L-type Ca2+ channel activity partially underlie the regional dichotomy in pumping behavior by murine peripheral and visceral lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Scott D Zawieja; Jorge A Castorena-Gonzalez; Joshua P Scallan; Michael J Davis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Valve-related modes of pump failure in collecting lymphatics: numerical and experimental investigation.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; M J Davis; J E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-07-11

6.  Lymphatic remodelling in response to lymphatic injury in the hind limbs of sheep.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Joshua S T Hooks; Mohammad S Razavi; Tristan Lewis; Cristina C Clement; Merrilee Thoresen; Matthew T Cribb; Mindy K Ross; Rudolph L Gleason; Laura Santambrogio; John F Peroni; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 7.  Innovations in lymph node targeting nanocarriers.

Authors:  Jihoon Kim; Paul A Archer; Susan N Thomas
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 11.130

8.  Pump function curve shape for a model lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; J E Moore
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Lymphatic System Flows.

Authors:  James E Moore; Christopher D Bertram
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 18.511

10.  Characterization of rat tail lymphatic contractility and biomechanics: incorporating nitric oxide-mediated vasoregulation.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; J Brandon Dixon; Rudolph L Gleason
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.