Literature DB >> 8475442

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants. General safety and superior imaging with titanium.

R Rupp1, N A Ebraheim, E R Savolaine, W T Jackson.   

Abstract

We studied the cases of 15 patients who underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after being treated with metal spinal implants. Spine stabilization was required in traumatic injuries for eight patients, cancer destruction in four patients, late cervical subluxation in one patient, spondylosis in one patient, and spondylolisthesis in one patient. A variety of stainless steel and titanium spinal implants were used. The images were evaluated for spinal and implant positioning and artifact production. Both stainless steel and titanium implants were imaged safely and there was no evidence of implant migration of local tissue-heating effect. The titanium spinal implants allowed postoperative spine imaging without the significant image distortion characteristic of the stainless steel implants. The stainless steel implants created significant artifact that impaired the usefulness of the magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact Following Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amir H Fayyazi; Jennifer Taormina; David Svach; Jeff Stein; Nathaniel R Ordway
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-14

2.  The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Heidrich; T Bruening; S Krefft; G Buchhorn; H M Klinger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The timing of fusion surgery for clival chordoma with occipito-cervical joint instability: before or after tumor resection?

Authors:  Hun Ho Park; Jeong-Yoon Park; Dong-Kyu Chin; Kyu-Sung Lee; Chang-Ki Hong
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  CT provides precise size assessment of implanted titanium alloy pedicle screws.

Authors:  Michael J Elliott; Joseph B Slakey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant.

Authors:  H Leclet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Implant detectibility of intervertebral disc spacers in post fusion MRI: evaluation of the MRI scan quality by using a scoring system--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gabert Heidrich; Wolfgang Schultz; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  [The postoperative cervical spine and evaluation of the spinal cord with magnetic resonance tomography].

Authors:  F Schweighofer; G Ranner; H P Hofer; R Wildburger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1995

8.  Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Vadim A Byvaltsev; Andrei A Kalinin; Morgan B Giers; Valerii V Shepelev; Yurii Ya Pestryakov; Mikhail Yu Biryuchkov
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Artifacts in spine magnetic resonance imaging due to different intervertebral test spacers: an in vitro evaluation of magnesium versus titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gottfried Buchhorn; Gabert Heidrich
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Buchhorn; G Heidrich
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.