Michael J Elliott1, Joseph B Slakey. 1. Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Children's Hospital Central California, Madera, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After performing instrumented spinal fusion with pedicle screws, postoperative imaging using CT to assess screw position may be necessary. Stainless steel implants produce significant metal artifact on CT, and the degree of distortion is at least partially dependent on the cross-sectional area of the implanted device. If the same effect occurs with titanium alloy implants, ability to precisely measure proximity of screws to adjacent structures may be adversely affected as screw size increases. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether (1) CT provides precise measurements of true screw widths; and (2) precision degrades based on the size of the titanium implant imaged. METHODS: CT scans performed on 20 patients after instrumented spinal fusion for scoliosis were reviewed. The sizes of 151 titanium alloy pedicle screws were measured and compared with known screw size. The amount of metal bloom artifact was determined for each of the four screw sizes. ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test were performed to evaluate differences in scatter, and Spearman's rho coefficient was used to measure relationship between screw size and scatter. RESULTS: All screws measured larger than their known size, but even with larger 7-mm screws the size differential was less than 1 mm. The four different screw sizes produced scatter amounts that were different from each other (p < 0.001).The amount of metal bloom artifact produced does increase as the size of the screw increases (rho = 0.962, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT of titanium alloy pedicle screws produces minimal artifact, thus making this the preferred imaging modality to assess screw position after surgery. Although the amount of artifact increases with the volume of titanium present, the degree of distortion is minimal and is usually less than 1 mm.
BACKGROUND: After performing instrumented spinal fusion with pedicle screws, postoperative imaging using CT to assess screw position may be necessary. Stainless steel implants produce significant metal artifact on CT, and the degree of distortion is at least partially dependent on the cross-sectional area of the implanted device. If the same effect occurs with titanium alloy implants, ability to precisely measure proximity of screws to adjacent structures may be adversely affected as screw size increases. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether (1) CT provides precise measurements of true screw widths; and (2) precision degrades based on the size of the titanium implant imaged. METHODS: CT scans performed on 20 patients after instrumented spinal fusion for scoliosis were reviewed. The sizes of 151 titanium alloy pedicle screws were measured and compared with known screw size. The amount of metal bloom artifact was determined for each of the four screw sizes. ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test were performed to evaluate differences in scatter, and Spearman's rho coefficient was used to measure relationship between screw size and scatter. RESULTS: All screws measured larger than their known size, but even with larger 7-mm screws the size differential was less than 1 mm. The four different screw sizes produced scatter amounts that were different from each other (p < 0.001).The amount of metal bloom artifact produced does increase as the size of the screw increases (rho = 0.962, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT of titanium alloy pedicle screws produces minimal artifact, thus making this the preferred imaging modality to assess screw position after surgery. Although the amount of artifact increases with the volume of titanium present, the degree of distortion is minimal and is usually less than 1 mm.
Authors: M R Zindrick; L L Wiltse; A Doornik; E H Widell; G W Knight; A G Patwardhan; J C Thomas; S L Rothman; B T Fields Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1987-03 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: M R Zindrick; L L Wiltse; E H Widell; J C Thomas; W R Holland; B T Field; C W Spencer Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1986-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Bardiya Akhbari; Amy Morton; Douglas Moore; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Scott W Wolfe; Joseph Crisco Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Yann Philippe Charles; Rawan Al Ansari; Arnaud Collinet; Pierre De Marini; Jean Schwartz; Rami Nachabe; Dirk Schäfer; Bernhard Brendel; Afshin Gangi; Roberto Luigi Cazzato Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2022-06-18 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Maximilian F Kasparek; Michael Töpker; Mathias Lazar; Michael Weber; Michael Kasparek; Thomas Mang; Paul Apfaltrer; Bernd Kubista; Reinhard Windhager; Helmut Ringl Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 4.342