Literature DB >> 9316256

Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.

D C Lerman1, B A Iwata, B Rainville, J D Adelinis, K Crosland, J Kogan.   

Abstract

The effects of reinforcement choice on task performance were examined with 6 individuals who had been diagnosed with severe to profound mental retardation. Five highly preferred items were identified for each participant via stimulus preference assessments. Participants then were exposed to choice and no-choice conditions that were alternated within reversal and multielement designs. During choice sessions, participants were permitted to select between two preferred stimuli contingent on responding. During no-choice sessions, the therapist delivered a single item contingent on responding. Preference for the stimuli was held constant across conditions by yoking the items delivered during no-choice sessions to those selected during the immediately preceding choice sessions. All participants exhibited similar rates of responding across choice and no-choice conditions. These findings indicate that for individuals with severe disabilities, access to choice may not improve task performance when highly preferred items are already incorporated into instructional programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9316256      PMCID: PMC1284059          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  22 in total

1.  Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.

Authors:  K Dyer; G Dunlap; V Winterling
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990

2.  On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.

Authors:  W W Fisher; R H Thompson; C C Piazza; K Crosland; D Gotjen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

3.  Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps.

Authors:  M B Parsons; D H Reid; J Reynolds; M Bumgarner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990

4.  Teaching choice making during social interactions to students with profound multiple disabilities.

Authors:  C H Kennedy; T G Haring
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

5.  Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.

Authors:  R G Smith; B A Iwata; B A Shore
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

6.  The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities.

Authors:  L M Bambara; C Ager; F Koger
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

7.  Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  L Foster-Johnson; J Ferro; G Dunlap
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

8.  Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges.

Authors:  G Dunlap; M dePerczel; S Clarke; D Wilson; S Wright; R White; A Gomez
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

9.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

10.  Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.

Authors:  M B Parsons; D H Reid
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990
View more
  9 in total

1.  A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice.

Authors:  R B Graff; M E Libby
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.

Authors:  K M Waldron-Soler; R C Martella; N E Marchand-Martella; T L Ebey
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.

Authors:  Stephen T North; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.

Authors:  W W Fisher; R H Thompson; C C Piazza; K Crosland; D Gotjen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

5.  Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; H L Goh; A S Worsdell
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

Review 6.  Basic and applied research on choice responding.

Authors:  W W Fisher; J E Mazur
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

7.  Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.

Authors:  A S Geckeler; M E Libby; R B Graff; W H Ahearn
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

8.  An evaluation of the value of choice-making opportunities in single-operant arrangements: simple fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Tiger; Karen A Toussaint; Christopher T Roath
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

9.  Effects of differential reinforcement and rules with feedback on preference for choice and verbal reports.

Authors:  Allen Karsina; Rachel H Thompson; Nicole M Rodriguez; Nicholas R Vanselow
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2012
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.