Literature DB >> 8472882

A comparison of auditory brain stem response thresholds and latencies elicited by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.

M P Gorga1, J R Kaminski, K L Beauchaine, B M Bergman.   

Abstract

Auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) were measured for stimuli presented both by air conduction and by bone conduction. Stimuli included clicks and tone bursts at octave frequencies from 250 to 4000 Hz. ABR thresholds were comparable for air- and bone-conducted stimuli. Wave V latencies were longer for bone-conducted stimuli compared to similar responses for air conduction. This effect was evident for both clicks and tone bursts. The fact that these latency differences were largely independent of stimulus spectrum suggests that they are not due to differences between the frequency responses of air and bone conduction transducers. This finding is expected when one considers the interaction between output, threshold, and frequency for both transducer types. These data also suggest that there are inherent differences in transmission by air and bone conduction that affect response latency but are unrelated to the amplitude spectrum in the signal.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8472882     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199304000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  9 in total

1.  Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia M Dierking; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Carol Manning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Tiffany A Johnson; Jan R Kaminski; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Comparison between audiometric and ABR thresholds in children. Contradictory findings.

Authors:  Timo I Marttila; Jukka O Karikoski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.

Authors:  Marlene Bagatto; Sheila Moodie; Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Shane Moodie; John Pumford; K P Rachel Liu
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

5.  Optimizing Parameters for Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response to Quickly Estimate Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Melissa J Polonenko; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 6.  Update on Bone-Conduction Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Review.

Authors:  Young Joon Seo; Chanbeom Kwak; Saea Kim; Yoon Ah Park; Kyoung Ho Park; Woojae Han
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2018-02-26

7.  Air and Bone Conduction Frequency-specific Auditory Brainstem Response in Children with Agenesis of the External Auditory Canal.

Authors:  Pricila Sleifer; Dayane Domeneghini Didoné; Ísis Bicca Keppeler; Claudine Devicari Bueno; Rudimar Dos Santos Riesgo
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-13

8.  Relationship between Behavioral and Objective Measures of Sound Intensity in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Hearing-Aid Users: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elsa Legris; John Galvin; Yassine Mofid; Nadia Aguillon-Hernandez; Sylvie Roux; Jean-Marie Aoustin; Marie Gomot; David Bakhos
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-15

9.  Electrophysiologic threshold study in air and bone conduction in children with 2 months or less age.

Authors:  Silvia Nápole Fichino; Doris Ruthy Lewis; Mariana Lopes Fávero
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.