Literature DB >> 16424946

Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.

Marlene Bagatto1, Sheila Moodie, Susan Scollie, Richard Seewald, Shane Moodie, John Pumford, K P Rachel Liu.   

Abstract

A discussion of the protocols used particularly in the clinical application of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL) Method is presented in this chapter. In the first section, the measurement and application of acoustic transforms is described in terms of their importance in the assessment phase of the amplification fitting process. Specifically, the implications of individual ear canal acoustics and their impact on accurately defining hearing thresholds are discussed. Detailed information about the statistical strength of the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) measurement and how to obtain the measure in young infants is also provided. In addition, the findings of a study that examined the relationship between behavioral and electrophysiologic thresholds in real-ear SPL is described. The second section presents information related to the electroacoustic verification of hearing instruments. The RECD is discussed in relation to its application in simulated measurements of real-ear hearing instrument performance. In particular, the effects of the transducer and coupling method during the RECD measurement are described in terms of their impact on verification measures. The topics of insertion gain, test signals, and venting are also considered. The third section presents three summary tables that outline the hearing instrument fitting process for infants, children, and adults. Overall, this chapter provides both clinical and scientific information about procedures used in the assessment and verification stages of the DSL Method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16424946      PMCID: PMC4111495          DOI: 10.1177/108471380500900404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  38 in total

1.  Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.

Authors:  B M Hoover; P G Stelmachowicz; D E Lewis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; Vanessa A Salisbury
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.

Authors:  Gabrielle H Saunders; Donald E Morgan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response measures of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss with islands of normal sensitivity.

Authors:  P B Balfour; J P Pillion; A E Gaskin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research.

Authors:  R A Bentler; C V Pavlovic
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise.

Authors:  T W Picton; J Ouellette; G Hamel; A D Smith
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1979-08

7.  Intersubject variability of real-ear sound pressure level: conventional and insert earphones.

Authors:  M Valente; L G Potts; M Valente; W Vass; J Goebel
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  A structured approach to hearing aid selection.

Authors:  R M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  D R Stapells; J S Gravel; B A Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.

Authors:  J A Feigin; J G Kopun; P G Stelmachowicz; M P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

Review 2.  Repeated Measurement of Absolute and Relative Judgments of Loudness: Clinical Relevance for Prescriptive Fitting of Aided Target Gains for soft, Comfortable, and Loud, But Ok Sound Levels.

Authors:  Craig Formby; JoAnne Payne; Xin Yang; Delphanie Wu; Jason M Parton
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

3.  Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Authors:  Vijay Parsa; Susan Scollie; Danielle Glista; Andreas Seelisch
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

4.  Pressurized Wideband Acoustic Stapedial Reflex Thresholds: Normal Development and Relationships to Auditory Function in Infants.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  False Belief Development in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing Compared With Peers With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Sophie E Ambrose; Jacob Oleson; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Use on Outcomes of Children With Mild Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Lenore Holte; Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Thomas Page; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Ruth Bentler; Lenore Holte; Patricia Roush; Jacob Oleson; John Van Buren; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss: Data Collection and Methods.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Elizabeth A Walker; Ryan W McCreery; Richard M Arenas; Melody Harrison; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Epilogue: Conclusions and Implications for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.