Literature DB >> 8445127

Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

D Brass1, D T Kemp.   

Abstract

Observations of the suppression of stimulus frequency evoked otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) by a second tone were made in human subjects. Measurements were made with the suppressor tone at frequencies and levels at, above, and below the stimulus tone generating the SFOAE. Data were collected with the stimulus tone at a range of levels (20-60 dB SPL), over a range of frequencies and in six different ears, in three subjects. The results were fitted to a phenomenological model, which allowed the data to be expressed as two parameters against the frequency of the suppressor tone. Characteristics of the suppression were examined, in particular the asymmetry between suppression by tones of higher and lower frequency than the tone evoking the SFOAE. At relatively low levels of suppressor tone, suppressors with frequencies higher than the stimulus tone were more effective suppressors than lower frequencies. At higher levels of suppressor tone, the situation was reversed, with lower frequencies being more effective than higher frequencies. These results were discussed in terms of nonlinear interaction between waves in the cochlea. This interpretation was used to estimate the shape of the traveling wave envelope produced by the stimulus tone, from the results of the suppression experiments. It was shown that the estimates of the shapes of the traveling wave envelope were nonlinear, the peak of the envelope becoming sharper at lower levels of stimulus. A simple quantitative model of SFOAE suppression was formulated using concepts of energy flow within the cochlea. This model produced SFOAE suppression results with all the major characteristics of SFOAE suppression from a real, human ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8445127     DOI: 10.1121/1.405453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

5.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

6.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Cochlear Frequency Tuning and Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

10.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.