Literature DB >> 8430199

Triple-dose versus standard-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: a randomized study in 199 patients.

J Haustein1, M Laniado, H P Niendorf, T Louton, W Beck, J Planitzer, M Schöffel, M Reiser, W Kaiser, W Schörner.   

Abstract

To investigate the safety, patient tolerance, and efficacy with 0.3 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the central nervous system (CNS), a phase 3 trial was conducted in 199 patients with suspected CNS lesions. Patients received either 0.1 or 0.3 mmol/kg gadopentate dimeglumine (injection time, 15 seconds and 45 seconds, respectively). T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were performed at either 0.5 T or 1.5 T. In 80 patients with enhancing brain lesions, contrast-to-noise ratios (C/Ns) were calculated, and lesion-to-brain contrast was evaluated visually. Six patients (6%) in each dose group reported adverse events. Eight adverse events occurred with 0.1 mmol/kg and seven with 0.3 mmol/kg. Vital signs and laboratory values did not change significantly. C/N (P < .05) and visual assessment ratings were higher with 0.3 mmol/kg than with 0.1 mmol/kg. According to these preliminary results, 0.3 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine is safe and well tolerated when administered at approximately 1 mL/sec.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8430199     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.186.3.8430199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

1.  Utility of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for qualitative evaluation of articular cartilage of patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Takehiro Nojiri; Nobuyoshi Watanabe; Takehiko Namura; Wataru Narita; Kazuya Ikoma; Takehiko Suginoshita; Hisatake Takamiya; Hiroto Komiyama; Hirotoshi Ito; Tsunehiko Nishimura; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Perspectives for preventive screening with total body MRI.

Authors:  Susanne C Ladd; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  High-dose contrast-enhanced MRI in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  T Koudriavtseva; C Pozzilli; C Di Biasi; M Iannilli; G Trasimeni; C Gasperini; C Argentino; G F Gualdi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases.

Authors:  Timothy J Kaufmann; Marion Smits; Jerrold Boxerman; Raymond Huang; Daniel P Barboriak; Michael Weller; Caroline Chung; Christina Tsien; Paul D Brown; Lalitha Shankar; Evanthia Galanis; Elizabeth Gerstner; Martin J van den Bent; Terry C Burns; Ian F Parney; Gavin Dunn; Priscilla K Brastianos; Nancy U Lin; Patrick Y Wen; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion using contrast-enhanced MR imaging: current status and future developments.

Authors:  A Mühler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review.

Authors:  Frederik L Giesel; Amit Mehndiratta; Marco Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in neonates and infants suspected of caval or aortic thrombosis.

Authors:  S Bruce Greenberg; Sadaf T Bhutta; Robert F Buchmann
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10-21

8.  A comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA for contrast-enhanced MRI of intracranial tumours.

Authors:  C Colosimo; M V Knopp; X Barreau; E Gérardin; M A Kirchin; F Guézénoc; K P Lodemann
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Biochemical safety profiles of gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Authors:  Hale Ersoy; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media.

Authors:  M F Bellin; M Vasile; S Morel-Precetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.