Literature DB >> 32048719

Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases.

Timothy J Kaufmann1, Marion Smits2, Jerrold Boxerman3, Raymond Huang4, Daniel P Barboriak5, Michael Weller6, Caroline Chung7, Christina Tsien8, Paul D Brown9, Lalitha Shankar10, Evanthia Galanis11, Elizabeth Gerstner12, Martin J van den Bent13, Terry C Burns14, Ian F Parney14, Gavin Dunn15, Priscilla K Brastianos16, Nancy U Lin17, Patrick Y Wen18, Benjamin M Ellingson19,20.   

Abstract

A recent meeting was held on March 22, 2019, among the FDA, clinical scientists, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocacy groups to discuss challenges and potential solutions for increasing development of therapeutics for central nervous system metastases. A key issue identified at this meeting was the need for consistent tumor measurement for reliable tumor response assessment, including the first step of standardized image acquisition with an MRI protocol that could be implemented in multicenter studies aimed at testing new therapeutics. This document builds upon previous consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) in high-grade gliomas and defines a protocol for brain metastases (BTIP-BM) that addresses unique challenges associated with assessment of CNS metastases. The "minimum standard" recommended pulse sequences include: (i) parameter matched pre- and post-contrast inversion recovery (IR)-prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (IR-GRE); (ii) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo acquired after injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent and before post-contrast 3D T1-weighted images; (iii) axial 2D or 3D T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery; (iv) axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images; and (v) post-contrast 2D T1-weighted spin echo images for increased lesion conspicuity. Recommended sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5T and 3T MR systems. An "ideal" protocol is also provided, which replaces IR-GRE with 3D TSE T1-weighted imaging pre- and post-gadolinium, and is best performed at 3T, for which dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion is included. Recommended perfusion parameters are given.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; brain metastases; imaging; protocol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32048719      PMCID: PMC7283031          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  151 in total

1.  The 39 steps: evading error and deciphering the secrets for accurate dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Authors:  Lisa Willats; Fernando Calamante
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  MR imaging of metastatic GI adenocarcinoma in brain.

Authors:  J C Egelhoff; J S Ross; M T Modic; T J Masaryk; M Estes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI.

Authors:  John P Mugler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Assessment of irradiated brain metastases using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Daniela B Almeida-Freitas; Marco C Pinho; Maria C G Otaduy; Henrique F Braga; Daniel Meira-Freitas; Claudia da Costa Leite
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Malignant melanoma and central nervous system metastases: incidence, diagnosis, treatment and survival.

Authors:  M H Amer; M Al-Sarraf; L H Baker; V K Vaitkevicius
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Usefulness of the Delay Alternating with Nutation for Tailored Excitation Pulse with T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolution in the Detection of Cerebral Metastases: Comparison with MPRAGE Imaging.

Authors:  D Kim; Y J Heo; H W Jeong; J W Baek; J-Y Han; J Y Lee; S-C Jin; H J Baek
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  (18)F-FDOPA PET for differentiating recurrent or progressive brain metastatic tumors from late or delayed radiation injury after radiation treatment.

Authors:  Karlo J Lizarraga; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Johannes Czernin; Antonio A F DeSalles; William H Yong; Michael E Phelps; Wei Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Cost-effectiveness of high-dose MR contrast studies in the evaluation of brain metastases.

Authors:  N A Mayr; W T Yuh; M G Muhonen; D J Fisher; H D Nguyen; J C Ehrhardt; B C Wen; J F Doornbos; D H Hussey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Early posttreatment assessment of MRI perfusion biomarkers can predict long-term response of lung cancer brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Neil K Taunk; Jung Hun Oh; Amita Shukla-Dave; Kathryn Beal; Behroze Vachha; Andrei Holodny; Vaios Hatzoglou
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Estimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA).

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; T Jonathan Yang; Kathryn Beal; Hubert Pan; Paul D Brown; Ananta Bangdiwala; Ryan Shanley; Norman Yeh; Laurie E Gaspar; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; John Boyle; John P Kirkpatrick; Kimberley S Mak; Helen A Shih; Alex Engelman; David Roberge; Nils D Arvold; Brian Alexander; Mark M Awad; Joseph Contessa; Veronica Chiang; John Hardie; Daniel Ma; Emil Lou; William Sperduto; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  37 in total

1.  Analyzing magnetic resonance imaging data from glioma patients using deep learning.

Authors:  Bjoern Menze; Fabian Isensee; Roland Wiest; Bene Wiestler; Klaus Maier-Hein; Mauricio Reyes; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Letter regarding "Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases".

Authors:  Estanislao Arana; Leoncio A Arribas
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Radiographic read paradigms and the roles of the central imaging laboratory in neuro-oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Matthew S Brown; Jerrold L Boxerman; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Timothy J Kaufmann; Patricia E Cole; Jeffrey A Bacha; David Leung; Amy Barone; Howard Colman; Martin J van den Bent; Patrick Y Wen; W K Alfred Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Jonathan G Goldin
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Response to Letter to Editor.

Authors:  Timothy J Kaufmann; Marion Smits; Jerrold Boxerman; Raymond Huang; Daniel P Barboriak; Michael Weller; Caroline Chung; Christina Tsien; Paul D Brown; Lalitha Shankar; Evanthia Galanis; Elizabeth Gerstner; Martin J van den Bent; Terry C Burns; Ian F Parney; Gavin Dunn; Priscilla K Brastianos; Nancy U Lin; Patrick Y Wen; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital "Flipbooks" to Control Systems Theory.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Victor A Levin; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Automated Color-Coding of Lesion Changes in Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1-Weighted Sequences for MRI Follow-up of Brain Metastases.

Authors:  D Zopfs; K Laukamp; R Reimer; N Grosse Hokamp; C Kabbasch; J Borggrefe; L Pennig; A C Bunck; M Schlamann; S Lennartz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Clinical Feasibility of Ultrafast Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted 3D-EPI for Evaluating Intracranial Enhancing Lesions in Oncology Patients: Comparison with Standard 3D MPRAGE Sequence.

Authors:  K H Ryu; H J Baek; S Skare; E Cho; I C Nam; T H Kim; T Sprenger
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Marion Smits
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  3D T1-weighted turbo spin echo contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T for frameless brain metastases radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Stephen C K Law; Ka Kin Wong; Gladys G Lo; Michael K M Kam; Wing Hong Kwan; Cindy Xue; Oi Lei Wong; Siu Ki Yu; Kin Yin Cheung
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Brain metastases: An update on the multi-disciplinary approach of clinical management.

Authors:  D K Mitchell; H J Kwon; P A Kubica; W X Huff; R O'Regan; M Dey
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 1.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.