Literature DB >> 15205859

A comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA for contrast-enhanced MRI of intracranial tumours.

C Colosimo1, M V Knopp, X Barreau, E Gérardin, M A Kirchin, F Guézénoc, K P Lodemann.   

Abstract

A two-centre intra-individual crossover study was performed in 23 patients with suspected high-grade glioma or metastases to assess and compare the safety and enhancement characteristics of two different MRI contrast media (gadobenate dimeglumine, Gd-BOPTA and gadoterate meglumine, Gd-DOTA) at equivalent doses of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) and T2-weighted fast SE images were obtained before and T1-weighted images 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 15 min after injection. T1-weighted images with magnetisation transfer contrast were acquired 12 min after injection. Qualitative assessment by blinded, off-site readers (reader 1:19 patients; reader 2:21) and on-site investigators (23) revealed significant (P< or =0.005) overall preference for Gd-BOPTA over Gd-DOTA for contrast enhancement (Gd-BOPTA preferred in 18, 15 and 18 cases; Gd-DOTA in 0, 1 and 1 and no preference in 1, 5 and 4; off-site readers 1 and 2, and on-site investigators, respectively). A similar significant preference for Gd-BOPTA was expressed by off-site readers and on-site investigators for lesion-to-brain contrast, lesion delineation, internal lesion structure, and overall image preference. Quantitative assessment by off-site readers revealed significantly (p<0.05) greater lesion enhancement with Gd-BOPTA than with Gd-DOTA at all times from 2 min after injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15205859     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-003-1128-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  35 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of metastatic disease to the brain with gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  D Balériaux; C Colosimo; J Ruscalleda; M Korves; G Schneider; K Bohndorf; G Bongartz; M A van Buchem; M Reiser; K Sartor; M W Bourne; P M Parizel; G R Cherryman; I Salerio; A La Noce; G Pirovano; M A Kirchin; A Spinazzi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  MR evaluation of CNS tumors: dose comparison study with gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol.

Authors:  W T Yuh; D J Fisher; J D Engelken; G M Greene; Y Sato; T J Ryals; M R Crain; J C Ehrhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  High-dose gadoteridol in MR imaging of intracranial neoplasms.

Authors:  V M Runge; J E Kirsch; V J Burke; A C Price; K L Nelson; G S Thomas; B L Dean; C Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Immunohistochemical demonstration of serum proteins in human cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  R J Seitz; W Wechsler
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  The use of non-parametric methods in the statistical analysis of the two-period change-over design.

Authors:  G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with central nervous system pathology: a comparison of OptiMARK (Gd-DTPA-BMEA) and Magnevist (Gd-DTPA).

Authors:  R I Grossman; D L Rubin; G Hunter; V M Haughton; D Lee; G Sze; M J Kuhn; K Maravilla; R Tu; W Heindel; F J Wippold; N Leeds; J Zelch; J R Jinkins; W Grodd; C Truwit; E Kanal; J M Provenzale; R Ramsey; J Simon; J A Brunberg; G R Stevens; R M Kristy
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Imaging of gliomas.

Authors:  T N Byrne
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 8.  Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance) pharmaceutical formulation and physicochemical properties of a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium.

Authors:  C de Haën; M Cabrini; L Akhnana; D Ratti; L Calabi; L Gozzini
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Gadodiamide injection and gadopentetate dimeglumine. A double-blind study in MR imaging of the CNS.

Authors:  G Myhr; P A Rinck; A Børseth
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Phase III multicenter trial of high-dose gadoteridol in MR evaluation of brain metastases.

Authors:  W T Yuh; D J Fisher; V M Runge; S W Atlas; S E Harms; K R Maravilla; N A Mayr; J E Mollman; A C Price
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  15 in total

1.  Reply.

Authors:  A Spinazzi; G Pirovano; N Shen; M A Kirchin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Kanal; K Maravilla; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of brain lesions: a large-scale intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadodiamide.

Authors:  H A Rowley; G Scialfa; P-y Gao; J A Maldjian; D Hassell; M J Kuhn; F J Wippold; M Gallucci; B C Bowen; I M Schmalfuss; J Ruscalleda; S Bastianello; C Colosimo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Does higher gadolinium concentration play a role in the morphologic assessment of brain tumors? Results of a multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobutrol versus gadobenate dimeglumine (the MERIT Study).

Authors:  Z Seidl; J Vymazal; M Mechl; M Goyal; M Herman; C Colosimo; M Pasowicz; R Yeung; B Paraniak-Gieszczyk; B Yemen; N Anzalone; A Citterio; G Schneider; S Bastianello; J Ruscalleda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Follow-up gliomas after radiotherapy: 1H MR spectroscopic imaging for increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Matthias Philipp Lichy; Christian Plathow; Daniela Schulz-Ertner; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The Benefits of High Relaxivity for Brain Tumor Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine with Gadoterate Meglumine (The BENEFIT Study).

Authors:  M Vaneckova; M Herman; M P Smith; M Mechl; K R Maravilla; J Weichet; M V Spampinato; J Žižka; F J Wippold; J J Baima; R Babbel; E Bültmann; R Y Huang; J-H Buhk; A Bonafé; C Colosimo; S Lui; M A Kirchin; N Shen; G Pirovano; A Spinazzi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review.

Authors:  Frederik L Giesel; Amit Mehndiratta; Marco Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for enhanced MR imaging of brain and spine tumours in children.

Authors:  Cesare Colosimo; Philippe Demaerel; Paolo Tortori-Donati; Catherine Christophe; Mark Van Buchem; Barry Högström; Gianpaolo Pirovano; Ningyan Shen; Miles A Kirchin; Alberto Spinazzi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-01-28

9.  Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadodiamide in the evaluation of spinal vascular anatomy with MR angiography.

Authors:  M V Spampinato; S A Nguyen; Z Rumboldt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Improving lesion detection and visualization: implications for neurosurgical planning and follow-up.

Authors:  Piero Picozzi; Miles A Kirchin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.