Literature DB >> 8419224

An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors.

R Lessor1, N Cervantes, N O'Connor, J Balmaceda, R H Asch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To design a recruitment program and analysis to determine social and psychological characteristics of women who volunteer to be oocyte donors; to evaluate consistency between clinical interviews and psychological testing; and to determine whether socially and psychologically normal women tend to volunteer. PARTICIPANTS: Over a 2-year period 95 women were recruited from a middle-class population surrounding the medical center. Candidates were evaluated on the basis of clinical interviews and performance on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Seventy-three percent were accepted, and 63% donated oocytes.
INTERVENTIONS: Interviews and psychological test evaluation were conducted independently by a clinical sociologist and a clinical psychologist; selections were made in a meeting of the treatment team.
RESULTS: Interview and test data demonstrated consistency and indicated that women who volunteer tend to be socially conventional, outgoing, and free from psychopathology. The typical donor tends to be 26 years old, married with one or two children, holds religious or spiritual beliefs, has 2 years of college, works at least part-time in a white collar job, and is a person with high energy who has additional interests. Incidence of dysfunction in family of origin or family of orientation (abandonment, abuse) is unremarkable. Although motherhood is highly valued by oocyte donor volunteers, in test performance this group does not endorse traditional female role stereotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: We have determined that this recruitment protocol is reliable for screening normal oocyte donors and would recommend its use in programs involved in oocyte donation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8419224     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55616-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

1.  Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients.

Authors:  S R Lindheim; S Kavic; M V Sauer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction.

Authors:  Andrea Mechanick Bravennan; Stephen L Corson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Families created through ovum donation: a preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  L Applegarth; N C Goldberg; I Cholst; N McGoff; D Fantini; N Zellers; A Black; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Exploring Motivations, Awareness of Side Effects, and Attitudes among Potential Egg Donors.

Authors:  Lindsay B Gezinski; Sharvari Karandikar; James Carter; Melinda White
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2016-05

5.  Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; C M Mazure; D L Olive; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Racial and ethnic disparities among donor oocyte banks in the United States.

Authors:  Shelun Tsai; Esther H Chung; Tracy Truong; Amanda S Farrell; Jenny Wu; Onyinye Ohamadike; Jennifer L Eaton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.490

7.  Oocyte donors’ awareness on donation procedure and risks: A call for developing guidelines for health tourism in oocyte donation programmes

Authors:  Pınar Tulay; Okan Atılan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-10-09

8.  A mental health intervention program for the oocyte donors: protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Elham Adib Moghaddam; Ashraf Kazemi; Gholamreza Kheirabadi; Seyyed Mehdi Ahmadi
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.