Literature DB >> 12416650

A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction.

Andrea Mechanick Bravennan1, Stephen L Corson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare levels of satisfaction for ovum donors and gestational carriers/surrogates (GCS), investigate attitudes, and explore beliefs about the role genetics, gestation, and environment play in various characteristics.
DESIGN: An east coast IVF center and two California-based agencies recruited donor and GCS candidates.
METHODS: Participants received mailed questionnaires that included sections on demographics, attitudes, and beliefs.
RESULTS: Both groups were highly satisfied with their participation. Donors were not willing to be GCS, and GCS were not willing to be donors. GCS thought about and disclosed their participation, felt children should be told about GCS, and desired future contact with the child(ren) more than did donors (p < 0.002). Donors did not indicate a preference about disclosure. Contact with recipients did not correlate with satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: Women who chose to donate eggs or to be GCS hold distinct and different beliefs about the role of gestation and genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12416650      PMCID: PMC3455677          DOI: 10.1023/a:1020306402235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  18 in total

1.  Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up questionnaire.

Authors:  M Partrick; A L Smith; W R Meyer; R A Bashford
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Why not donate sperm? A study of potential donors.

Authors:  Michael Emond; Joanna E Scheib
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.178

3.  Predicting anonymous egg donor satisfaction: a preliminary study.

Authors:  S C Klock; A M Braverman; D T Rausch
Journal:  J Womens Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Semen donor recruitment: a study of donors in two clinics.

Authors:  K R Daniels; R Curson; G M Lewis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Gamete registry? A Trojan horse from those seeking regulation.

Authors:  M V Sauer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Why we believe there should be a gamete registry.

Authors:  S L Corson; A Mechanick-Braverman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Factors related to preferences in gamete donor sources.

Authors:  A M Braverman; S L Corson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors.

Authors:  R Lessor; N Cervantes; N O'Connor; J Balmaceda; R H Asch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  A survey of semen donation: phase II--the view of the donors.

Authors:  R Cook; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; C M Mazure; D L Olive; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  2 in total

1.  Screening of gestational carriers in the United States.

Authors:  Erika L Fuchs; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Gestational carriers: A viable alternative for women with medical contraindications to pregnancy.

Authors:  Raymond M Anchan; Stacey A Missmer; Katharine F Correia; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  Open J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.