Literature DB >> 27263197

Exploring Motivations, Awareness of Side Effects, and Attitudes among Potential Egg Donors.

Lindsay B Gezinski, Sharvari Karandikar, James Carter, Melinda White.   

Abstract

This research study surveyed prospective egg donors at orientation to (a) understand women's motivations to donate eggs, (b) assess awareness and knowledge of egg donation prior to entry into the egg donation program, and (c) explore attitudes toward egg donation. Ninety-two women completed the questionnaire at one fertility clinic located in the Midwest between August 2011 and August 2012. Descriptive and inferential statistics as well as textual analysis were used to analyze the data. Three themes emerged regarding participant motivations: (1) altruistic, (2) financial, and (3) desire to pass on genetic material. The majority of participants were unconcerned with potential physical and psychological side effects; however, differences emerged based on motherhood status and educational level. Although potential donors felt recipients should receive some information about the donor, they tended to value privacy regarding information giving to resultant offspring. This research study has implications for social work practice, policy, and future research. It is crucial that women receive adequate procedural and side effect information prior to engaging in egg donation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27263197      PMCID: PMC4888091          DOI: 10.1093/hsw/hlw005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Work        ISSN: 0360-7283


  17 in total

1.  Assessing the influence of payment on motivations of women participating as oocyte donors.

Authors:  S R Lindheim; J Chase; M V Sauer
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up questionnaire.

Authors:  M Partrick; A L Smith; W R Meyer; R A Bashford
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Financial incentives in recruitment of oocyte donors. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors.

Authors:  Susan Caruso Klock; Jan Elman Stout; Marie Davidson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  A qualitative follow-up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation.

Authors:  A L Kalfoglou; J Gittelsohn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: ethnic differences and altruism.

Authors:  S Purewal; O B A van den Akker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-01-19

7.  Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment.

Authors:  D Fielding; S Handley; L Duqueno; S Weaver; S Lui
Journal:  J Community Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

8.  Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors.

Authors:  L R Schover; R L Collins; M M Quigley; J Blankstein; G Kanoti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Demographic variables related to successful anonymous oocyte donor recruitment.

Authors:  Patricia Sachs; Sharon N Covington; Carol Toll; Kevin S Richter; Michele Purcell; Frank E Chang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors.

Authors:  R Lessor; N Cervantes; N O'Connor; J Balmaceda; R H Asch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  Why is use of donor eggs not viewed as treatment failure? A call for improvements in treatments with autologous oocytes.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  In search of stool donors: a multicenter study of prior knowledge, perceptions, motivators, and deterrents among potential donors for fecal microbiota transplantation.

Authors:  Breanna McSweeney; Jessica R Allegretti; Monika Fischer; Huiping Xu; Karen J Goodman; Tanya Monaghan; Carmen McLeod; Benjamin H Mullish; Elaine O Petrof; Emmalee L Phelps; Roxana Chis; Abby Edmison; Angela Juby; Ralph Ennis-Davis; Brandi Roach; Karen Wong; Dina Kao
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2019-05-23

3.  Beliefs, attitudes and funding of assisted reproductive technology: Public perception of over 6,000 respondents from 6 European countries.

Authors:  Bart C J M Fauser; Jacky Boivin; Pedro N Barri; Basil C Tarlatzis; Lone Schmidt; Rachel Levy-Toledano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.