Literature DB >> 8580652

Families created through ovum donation: a preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment.

L Applegarth1, N C Goldberg, I Cholst, N McGoff, D Fantini, N Zellers, A Black, Z Rosenwaks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study attempted to obtain preliminary follow-up information regarding obstetrical outcomes and the psychosocial well-being of families created through the ovum donation. There is presently very little known about this population with respect to obstetrical care, health status of offspring, family and marital relationships of recipient couples, or how couples feel about having chosen ovum donation as a family-building option.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine couples were initially surveyed and, ultimately, extensive information was obtained for 30 husbands, 31 wives, and 51 offspring. There was a very high percentage of cesarean section deliveries (81.6%), and although a few children experienced health problems at birth, they are all now in good health and developmental milestones are within normal limits. Information was also obtained about breast-feeding experiences, choice of donor (known [sister] or anonymous), reasons for choosing ovum donation over other parenting options, and the impact of this choice on marital and family relationships. Demographic data were also obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: For many infertile couples, the long struggle to become parents culminated in a successful birth, and the experience of pregnancy seemed to meet a need to be both biological and psychosocial parents. In general, subjects were extremely cooperative with the investigation and they indicated a desire to learn as much as possible about the psychosocial status of families created through ovum donation. As the assisted reproductive technologies move rapidly into the 21st century, it now seems imperative that health and mental health professionals gain more knowledge about the impact of third party reproduction and the psychosocial adjustment and well-being of families created by this medical technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8580652     DOI: 10.1007/bf02212577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  7 in total

1.  Psychological patterns in donor insemination couples.

Authors:  D M Berger; A Eisen; J Shuber; K F Doody
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Psychosocial aspects of parenthood by artificial insemination donor.

Authors:  J Kremer; B W Frijling; J L Nass
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-03-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Attitudes of parents of young children to sperm donation--implications for donor recruitment.

Authors:  A Purdie; J C Peek; V Adair; F Graham; R Fisher
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors.

Authors:  L R Schover; R L Collins; M M Quigley; J Blankstein; G Kanoti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  A controlled study of the psycho-social development of children conceived following insemination with donor semen.

Authors:  G T Kovacs; D Mushin; H Kane; H W Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors.

Authors:  R Lessor; N Cervantes; N O'Connor; J Balmaceda; R H Asch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Quality of parenting in families created by the new reproductive technologies: a brief report of preliminary findings.

Authors:  S Golombok; R Cook; A Bish; C Murray
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.949

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients.

Authors:  S R Lindheim; S Kavic; M V Sauer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Distributive justice in the allocation of donor oocytes.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.