Literature DB >> 10806594

Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients.

S R Lindheim1, S Kavic, M V Sauer.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10806594     DOI： 10.1023/a:1017257719479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN： 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Predicting anonymous egg donor satisfaction: a preliminary study.

Authors:  S C Klock; A M Braverman; D T Rausch
Journal:  J Womens Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  A program for matched, anonymous oocyte donation.

Authors:  E A Kennard; R L Collins; J Blankstein; L R Schover; G Kanoti; J Reiss; M M Quigley
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Follow-up study of anonymous ovum donors.

Authors:  H Rosenberg; Y Epstein
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation.

Authors:  V Söderström-Anttila
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Families created through ovum donation: a preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  L Applegarth; N C Goldberg; I Cholst; N McGoff; D Fantini; N Zellers; A Black; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors.

Authors:  L R Schover; R L Collins; M M Quigley; J Blankstein; G Kanoti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  An analysis of social and psychological characteristics of women volunteering to become oocyte donors.

Authors:  R Lessor; N Cervantes; N O'Connor; J Balmaceda; R H Asch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Recruitment and screening policies and procedures used to establish a paid donor oocyte registry.

Authors:  S R Lindheim; M Frumovitz; M V Sauer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Couples' reactions to male infertility and donor insemination.

Authors:  D M Berger
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; C M Mazure; D L Olive; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412
View more
  2 in total

1.  Development and Validation of A Decision-Making Donor Conception Questionnaire in Iranian Infertile Couples.

Authors:  Fatemeh Hadizadeh-Talasaz; Masoumeh Simbar; Habibollah Esmaily; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-07-14

2.  Oocyte donors’ awareness on donation procedure and risks: A call for developing guidelines for health tourism in oocyte donation programmes

Authors:  Pınar Tulay; Okan Atılan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-10-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.