Literature DB >> 9659323

Digital radiology in skeletal trauma: assessment of casualty officers' performance.

J H Gillard1, C Hubbard, R Das, H Sherriff.   

Abstract

Radiographic images can now be produced without the requirement of film processing and development, and can be displayed rapidly on a computer monitor. We assessed junior doctors' performance in interpreting images from 25 patients being investigated for possible fracture and also compared the diagnostic abilities of casualty officers with those of radiology specialist registrars. For interpretation of images viewed at a workstation or as filmed laser images, respectively, sensitivities were 75% and 78%, and specificities were 65% and 76%. These differences were not significant. There was a tendency for radiology specialist registrars to be less specific when reviewing images at a workstation. The demonstration that there is no loss in diagnostic quality when casualty officers interpret fracture images in a purely digitally acquired and viewed format forms a robust basis for economic evaluation of the technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9659323      PMCID: PMC1296560          DOI: 10.1177/014107689809100304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Teleradiology for the emergency room.

Authors:  N J Kagetsu; R C Ablow
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-12-17       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  H L Kundel; S B Seshadri; C P Langlotz; P N Lanken; S C Horii; C F Nodine; M Polansky; E Feingold; I Brikman; M Bozzo; R Redfern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Storage phosphor radiography.

Authors:  C M Schaefer-Prokop; M Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Digital radiography for clinical applications.

Authors:  H P Busch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study.

Authors:  S A Wegryn; D W Piraino; B J Richmond; M D Schluchter; M Uetani; H A Freed; M A Meziane; G A Belhobek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  New high-resolution teleradiology system: prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in 685 transmitted clinical cases.

Authors:  M A Goldberg; D I Rosenthal; F S Chew; J G Blickman; S W Miller; P R Mueller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: comparison of laser-digitized workstation images and conventional analog radiographs.

Authors:  S J Ackerman; J N Gitlin; R W Gayler; C D Flagle; R N Bryan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Digitized radiographs in skeletal trauma: a performance comparison between a digital workstation and the original film images.

Authors:  A J Wilson; J C Hodge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Comparative evaluation of digital radiography versus conventional radiography of fractured skulls.

Authors:  H J Langen; H M Klein; B Wein; A Stargardt; R W Günther
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging.

Authors:  M D Murphey; J M Bramble; L T Cook; N L Martin; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.