| Literature DB >> 17191103 |
Joseph N Gitlin1, Anand K Narayan, Chad A Mitchell, Ali M Akmal, David J Eisner, Lindsy M Peterson, Daisy Nie, Tyler R McClintock.
Abstract
An acceptable mammography film digitizer must provide high-quality images at a level of diagnostic accuracy comparable to reading conventional film examinations. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are significant differences between the interpretations of conventional film-screen mammography examinations and soft copy readings of the images produced by a mammography film digitizer. Eight radiologists interpreted 120 mammography examinations, half as original films and the other half as digital images on a soft copy work station. No radiologist read the same examination twice. The interpretations were recorded in accordance with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and included other variables such as perceived image quality and diagnostic difficulty and confidence. The results provide support for the hypothesis that there are no significant differences between the interpretations of conventional film-screen mammography examinations and soft copy examinations produced by a mammography film digitizer.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2007 PMID： 17191103 PMCID： PMC3043891 DOI： 10.1007/s10278-006-1046-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Digit Imaging ISSN： 0897-1889 Impact factor: 4.056