Literature DB >> 8407600

A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions.

D McFadden1.   

Abstract

Hearing sensitivity and the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions show parallel ear and sex differences in humans. Here it is proposed that these lateral asymmetries and sex differences may all result from differences in the 'strength' of the efferent inhibition delivered to individual cochleas. Specifically, it is proposed that the amount of efferent inhibition is relatively less in right ears and in females than in left ears and males. While it is unclear why or how ear asymmetries or sex differences would develop in the efferent system, by assuming that they do, one can begin to explain a number of basic facts of hearing. It is even possible that the lateral asymmetry in the efferent system may be related to the well-known cortical asymmetries that are believed to underlie speech perception, speech production, and other human abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8407600     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90118-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

1.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Ear effect and gender difference of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Kimberly Z Wissler; Kyoko Nagao; L A Greenwood; Rebecca G Gaffney; R M Cardinale; Thierry Morlet
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2014-07-18

3.  Comparison of the auditory systems of heterosexuals and homosexuals: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.

Authors:  Mikaella Sarrou; Pia Marlena Schmitz; Nicole Hamm; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Prevalence of hearing loss in Black and White elders: results of the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Sheila R Pratt; Lewis Kuller; Evelyn O Talbott; Kathleen McHugh-Pemu; Alhaji M Buhari; Xiaohui Xu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  A masculinizing effect on the auditory systems of human females having male co-twins.

Authors:  D McFadden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.