Literature DB >> 29998350

Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.

Mikaella Sarrou1,2, Pia Marlena Schmitz3, Nicole Hamm4, Rudolf Rübsamen4.   

Abstract

The current study examines the modulation of the motion-onset response based on the frequency-range of sound stimuli. Delayed motion-onset and stationary stimuli were presented in a free-field by sequentially activating loudspeakers on an azimuthal plane keeping the natural percept of externalized sound presentation. The sounds were presented in low- or high-frequency ranges and had different motion direction within each hemifield. Difference waves were calculated by contrasting the moving and stationary sounds to isolate the motion-onset responses. Analyses carried out at the peak amplitudes and latencies on the difference waves showed that the early part of the motion response (cN1) was modulated by the frequency range of the sounds with stronger amplitudes elicited by stimuli with high frequency range. Subsequent post hoc analysis of the normalized amplitude of the motion response confirmed the previous finding by excluding the possibility that the frequency range had an overall effect on the waveform, and showing that this effect was instead limited to the motion response. These results support the idea of a modular organization of the motion-onset response with the processing of primary sound motion characteristics being reflected in the early part of the response. Also, the article highlights the importance of specificity in auditory stimulus design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory motion; Difference wave; Event-related potential; Frequency; Human

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998350     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5329-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  The effect of spatial adaptation on auditory motion processing.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann; Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Hemispheric asymmetry of the right ear advantage in dichotic listening.

Authors:  James Jerger; Jeffrey Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications.

Authors:  Maria Chait; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Limited segregation of different types of sound localization information among classes of units in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Steven M Chase; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Interaural time and level differences: integrated or separated processing?

Authors:  E Schröger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Evoked and intrinsic asymmetries during auditory attention: implications for the contralateral and neglect models of functioning.

Authors:  Terri M Teshiba; Josef Ling; David A Ruhl; Bronwyn S Bedrick; Amanda Peña; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Absence of direction-specific cross-modal visual-auditory adaptation in motion-onset event-related potentials.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Jörg Lewald; Jesko L Verhey; Michael B Hoffmann; Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

10.  P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects.

Authors:  M J Sugg; J Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1995-11-16       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.