Literature DB >> 8395584

Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.

N P Cooper1, D Robertson, G K Yates.   

Abstract

1. Single-fiber responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (AM) tones were recorded from the cochlear nerves of anesthetized guinea pigs. Stimuli were presented at the fiber's characteristic frequency (CF) and covered the intensity range between the fiber's minimum rate threshold and 90-100 dB SPL in 5- or 6-dB steps. The amount of modulation in each fiber's response and the average rate of the responses were quantified. The observed response modulation was compared with the modulation to be expected on the assumption that the instantaneous discharge rates varied with intensity in the same way that the average rates did (i.e., as predicted from each fiber's average-rate vs. level function). 2. The difference between the observed and expected response modulation varied widely across fibers. In most fibers' the responses to a limited range of stimulus intensities (typically between 20 and 30 dB above the fiber's rate threshold) were modulated far more than expected on the basis of their average rates, with responses to stimuli either above or below this range differing progressively less from expectation. Little or no response modulation was observed above approximately 70 dB SPL in these fibers. Other fibers exhibited response modulation that exceeded the expected modulation by smaller amounts, but maintained this modulation to much higher sound pressure levels. 3. The discrepancy between the observed and expected responses to AM stimuli also varied with the frequency of modulation (fm) within individual fibers. The discrepancies were least pronounced at low fms (e.g., 10 Hz) but became progressively larger as fm was increased to between 50 and 320 Hz (subject to the inter-fiber variations described in 2, above). 4. The AM response characteristics varied systematically with the fiber's spontaneous rate and other response characteristics (e.g., rate threshold, CF rate vs. level function type, and rapid adaptation characteristics). In particular, the most sensitive, high spontaneous rate fibers had responses that adapted rapidly after the onset of a stimulus, and showed the greatest enhancement of AM-related information at low-to-moderate stimulus intensities. However, these fibers appeared incapable of encoding AM-related information at high intensities, since their response rates "saturated" and their AM response enhancements diminished around 30 dB above threshold. In contrast, the less sensitive (i.e., higher threshold), lower spontaneous rate fibers showed less evidence of rapid adaptation near the onsets of their response, and lesser enhancements of the modulated responses predicted from their average-rate versus level functions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8395584     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  A unified mechanism for spontaneous-rate and first-spike timing in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Ongoing temporal coding of a stochastic stimulus as a function of intensity: time-intensity trading.

Authors:  Pascal Michelet; Damir Kovacić; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.

Authors:  Anna Dreyer; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

8.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus single neurons can enhance temporal processing capabilities in background noise.

Authors:  R D Frisina; J P Walton; K J Karcich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Temporal codes for amplitude contrast in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Michelle D Valero; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.