Literature DB >> 7895792

Dorsal cochlear nucleus single neurons can enhance temporal processing capabilities in background noise.

R D Frisina1, J P Walton, K J Karcich.   

Abstract

Envelope temporal fluctuations are critical for effective processing of biologically relevant sounds including speech, animal vocalizations, sound-source location and pitch. Amplitude modulation (AM) of sound envelopes can be encoded in quiet with high fidelity by some auditory neurons, including those of the cochlear nucleus. From both neurophysiological and clinical perspectives, it is important to understand the effects of background noise on the processing of AM. To further this goal, single-unit recordings were made from dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) units in urethane-anesthetized chinchillas. All units of this study were classified as pauser/buildup or On-s units according to PSTH response patterns, first spike latencies, and shape of best-frequency (BF) rate-intensity functions. BF pure-tone and AM (10-500 Hz) tone bursts were presented at several sound levels, in quiet and in the presence of a continuous wideband masker. The following was found: (1) DCN units can enhance their AM coding relative to quiet in the presence of loud noise (+14 or +19 dB S/N) and at high signal levels (e.g. 75 dB SPL); (2) for the sample of units of the present study, this is usually achieved by lowering the average firing rate and increasing the synchronous (fundamental frequency) response; (3) for some units, the AM coding stays the same or declines in the background noise. The nature of these findings suggests that part of a DCN unit's abilities to preserve or enhance AM coding with masking noise results from peripheral operating range shifts, whereas part comes from intrinsic circuitry (inhibitory inputs) or cellular mechanisms (dendritic filtering of sound temporal features) within the DCN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7895792     DOI: 10.1007/bf00232448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement.

Authors:  R D Frisina; R L Smith; S C Chamberlain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum.

Authors:  D O Kim; J G Sirianni; S O Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Functional organization of mustached bat inferior colliculus: II. Connections of the FM2 region.

Authors:  R D Frisina; W E O'Neill; M L Zettel
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Stimulus properties influencing the responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  A Rees; A R Møller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Topographical organization.

Authors:  C E Schreiner; G Langner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.

Authors:  N P Cooper; D Robertson; G K Yates
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones.

Authors:  A Rees; A R Møller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Neuronal mechanisms for pitch analysis in the time domain.

Authors:  G Langner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli in the guinea pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise.

Authors:  A Rees; A R Palmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effect of carrier level on tuning in amplitude-modulation masking.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Action potential timing precision in dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Sarah E Street; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Age-related changes in glycine receptor subunit composition and binding in dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  H Wang; J G Turner; L Ling; J L Parrish; L F Hughes; D M Caspary
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Aged-related loss of temporal processing: altered responses to amplitude modulated tones in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  T A Schatteman; L F Hughes; D M Caspary
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Temporal and binaural properties in dorsal cochlear nucleus and its output tract.

Authors:  P X Joris; P H Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  I M Winter; L Wiegrebe; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system.

Authors:  Donald M Caspary; Lynne Ling; Jeremy G Turner; Larry F Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Offset analgesia: a temporal contrast mechanism for nociceptive information.

Authors:  Marc D Yelle; June M Rogers; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.961

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.