Literature DB >> 8371087

Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.

M J Lewellen1, S D Goldinger, D B Pisoni, B G Greene.   

Abstract

College students were separated into 2 groups (high and low) on the basis of 3 measures: subjective familiarity ratings of words, self-reported language experiences, and a test of vocabulary knowledge. Three experiments were conducted to determine if the groups also differed in visual word naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. High Ss were consistently faster than low Ss in naming visually presented words. They were also faster and more accurate in making difficult lexical decisions and in rejecting homophone foils in semantic categorization. Taken together, the results demonstrate that Ss who differ in lexical familiarity also differ in processing efficiency. The relationship between processing efficiency and working memory accounts of individual differences in language processing is also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8371087      PMCID: PMC3514868          DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.122.3.316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  21 in total

1.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Individual differences in speed of phonemic analysis, visual analysis, and reading.

Authors:  J Baron; B J McKillop
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1975-04

3.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.

Authors:  S Sternberg
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 0.548

4.  Processing determinants of reading speed.

Authors:  M D Jackson; L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-06

5.  On the nature of intelligence.

Authors:  E Hunt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Individual differences in long-term memory access.

Authors:  E B Hunt; J Davidson; M Lansman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-11

7.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-11

8.  Intelligence as an information-processing concept.

Authors:  E Hunt
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1980-11

9.  Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning.

Authors:  E A Doctor; M Coltheart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-05

10.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  K R Paap; S L Newsome; J E McDonald; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  26 in total

1.  Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Aging and the vulnerability of speech to dual task demands.

Authors:  Susan Kemper; RaLynn Schmalzried; Lesa Hoffman; Ruth Herman
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-12

3.  Perception and recognition memory of words and werds: two-way mirror effects.

Authors:  D Vaughn Becker; Stephen D Goldinger; Gregory O Stone
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

4.  Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect?

Authors:  Christopher R Sears; Paul D Siakaluk; Verna C Chow; Lori Buchanan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-07

5.  Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).

Authors:  Adrienne S Roman; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.

Authors:  H H Schilling; K Rayner; J I Chumbley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

7.  How a hobby can shape cognition: visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players.

Authors:  Ian S Hargreaves; Penny M Pexman; Lenka Zdrazilova; Peter Sargious
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

8.  Effects of Early Musical Experience on Auditory Sequence Memory.

Authors:  Adam T Tierney; Tonya R Bergeson-Dana; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Empir Musicol Rev       Date:  2008-10-01

9.  Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

10.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.