Literature DB >> 528903

Processing determinants of reading speed.

M D Jackson, L McClelland.   

Abstract

Two groups of university undergraduates differing in reading ability were tested on a number of reaction-time tasks designed to determine the speed of encoding visual information at several different levels. In addition, the subjects were given tests of sensory functions, verbal and quantitative reasoning ability, short-term auditory memory span, and ability to comprehend spoken text. The groups did not differ on the sensory tests. However, the faster reader group had faster reaction times on all of the reaction-time tasks, and the size of the fast-reader advantage increased with the mean reaction time. Faster readers also performed more accurately in verbal and quantitative reasoning, short-term auditory memory, and speech comprehension. Regression analyses suggested that the ability to comprehend spoken material and speed of accessing overlearned memory codes for visually presented letters represented two important independent correlates of reading ability in our sample of subjects. Two variables reflecting these abilities--the percentage of correct answers to a listening comprehension test and the reaction time for correct responses in a letter-matching task--accounted for nearly all of the variance in reading ability tapped by both of our reading tests. In a second experiment, no reaction-time difference was found between fast and average readers in a matching task requiring no long-term memory code access but considerable visual information processing as indexed by overall mean reaction time. The results supported the conclusion that one skill allowing fast readers to capture more information from each reading fixation is faster access to letter codes from print.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528903     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.108.2.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  30 in total

1.  Evidence for a difference in syntactic knowledge between skilled and less skilled adult readers.

Authors:  L Cupples; V M Holmes
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1992-07

2.  Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: the cognitive correlates of print exposure.

Authors:  K E Stanovich; A E Cunningham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

3.  Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities.

Authors:  Hugh W Catts; Tiffany P Hogan; Marc E Fey
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

4.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

5.  Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?

Authors:  K E Stanovich
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1985-01

6.  Use of an orton-gillingham approach to teach a foreign language to dyslexic/learning-disabled students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language.

Authors:  R L Sparks; L Ganschow; S Kenneweg; K Miller
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1991-01

7.  Automaticity training for dyslexics: An experimental study.

Authors:  L K Holt-Ochsner; F R Manis
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1992-12

8.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Daneman; P M Merikle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

9.  Is reading ability related to activation dumping speed? Evidence from immediate repetition priming.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-01

10.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher; K R Varner; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.