Literature DB >> 8367774

Artificial disc replacement. Preliminary report with a 3-year minimum follow-up.

P Enker1, A Steffee, C Mcmillin, L Keppler, R Biscup, S Miller.   

Abstract

Artificial disc replacement was performed in six patients with an average age of 55 years and average follow-up of 3.4 years. Four of the six patients had juxtafusion degeneration, one had multilevel disc degeneration, and one patient had isolated disc resorption. The Acroflex disc (Acromed Corporation, Cleveland, OH), which was used in the replacement, is composed of a rubber core vulcanized to two titanium end plates. The latter have superior posts to provide for initial mechanical fixation and porous in-growth surfaces for long-term fixation. Satisfactory results occurred in four of six patients. Poor results occurred in the presence of deformity that resulted in prosthetic failure and isolated disc resorption. There was an average 8 degrees angular and 2.3-mm translational movement and satisfactory in-growth at all interfaces. Design objectives of endurance, biocompatibility, geometry, kinematics, constraint, dynamics, stability, and fail-safe were met; however, this study is preliminary in nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8367774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Julia F Funk; Sascha V Schneider; Christian Gross; Stephan W Tohtz; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Carsten Perka; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Methodological aspects of outcomes research.

Authors:  Rudi Hiebert; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Multidirectional flexibility analysis of anterior and posterior lumbar artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Bryan W Cunningham; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Anton E Dmitriev; Niabin Hu; Manabu Ito; Yasuo Shikinami; Paul C McAfee; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Revision surgery after implantation of a vertebral disc prosthesis].

Authors:  C Hopf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Nucleus disc arthroplasty with the NUBAC™ device: 2-year clinical experience.

Authors:  M Balsano; A Zachos; A Ruggiu; F Barca; P Tranquilli-Leali; C Doria
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine Total disc replacement as an alternative to lumbar fusion?].

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  The Changes in Range of Motion after a Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty with Charité in the Human Cadaveric Spine under Physiologic Compressive Follower Preload : A Comparative Study between Load Control Protocol and Hybrid Protocol.

Authors:  Se-Hoon Kim; Ung-Kyu Chang; Jae-Chil Chang; Kwon-Soo Chun; T Jesse Lim; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-08-31

9.  Two-level total lumbar disc replacement.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.