Literature DB >> 16317562

Methodological aspects of outcomes research.

Rudi Hiebert1, Margareta Nordin.   

Abstract

A critical evaluation of existing scientific evidence of treatment efficacy can be an important part of communicating risk and benefits of treatment options to patients during the course of clinical practice. A checklist of key methodological issues to examine when reading a research study is presented and discussed. Steps in reading a paper include: identifying the research question; identifying the manner in which subjects get enrolled in the study; identifying the treatments and outcomes used; identifying the study design and the comparisons being made; evaluating the study methods for the possibility of bias and uncontrolled confounding; assessing whether the statistical analysis used is appropriate for the study design; assessing whether the study has sufficient statistical power to demonstrate hypotheses being tested. Finally, procedures for grading and evaluating evidence, as used by systematic review groups and international best evidence synthesis consensus groups is briefly described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16317562      PMCID: PMC3454552          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1057-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  42 in total

1.  The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain.

Authors:  L Abenhaim; M Rossignol; J P Valat; M Nordin; B Avouac; F Blotman; J Charlot; R L Dreiser; E Legrand; S Rozenberg; P Vautravers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Developing theoretical constructs for outcomes research.

Authors:  Y M Coyle
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.378

3.  Increasing age does not affect good outcome after lumbar disc replacement.

Authors:  A H Sott; D J Harrison
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Randomized controlled trials in surgery: an essential component of scientific progress.

Authors:  T S Carey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A Hungarian example for handsearching specialized national healthcare journals of small countries for controlled trials. Is it worth the trouble?

Authors:  D Bereczki; G Gesztelyi
Journal:  Health Libr Rev       Date:  2000-09

6.  Re: randomized controlled trials in surgery: an essential component of scientific progress (Spine 1999; 24:2553-5)

Authors:  W K Fu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Clinical practice. Persistent low back pain.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial.

Authors:  Rick B Delamarter; Hyun W Bae; Ben B Pradhan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 9.  Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations.

Authors:  C Bombardier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Lumbar disc prosthesis. Surgical technique, indications and clinical results in 22 patients with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  T David
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical spondylosis with spinal cord encroachment: should preventive surgery be recommended?

Authors:  Donald R Murphy; Christopher M Coulis; Jonathan K Gerrard
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2009-08-24

3.  Current understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulation and stroke: what does it mean for the chiropractic profession?

Authors:  Donald R Murphy
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-08-03

4.  Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Aryan Behechtnejad; Alexander Ouchmaev; Matthias Morfeld; Karin Schermelleh-Engel; Michael Amling; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk factors for gastroenteritis in child day care.

Authors:  R Enserink; L Mughini-Gras; E Duizer; T Kortbeek; W Van Pelt
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Does case misclassification threaten the validity of studies investigating the relationship between neck manipulation and vertebral artery dissection stroke? No.

Authors:  Donald R Murphy; Michael J Schneider; Stephen M Perle; Christopher G Bise; Michael Timko; Mitchell Haas
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-11-05

Review 7.  Effects of Herbal Mouthwashes on Plaque and Inflammation Control for Patients with Gingivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  He Cai; Junyu Chen; Nirmala K Panagodage Perera; Xing Liang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.629

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.