Literature DB >> 16552532

Multidirectional flexibility analysis of anterior and posterior lumbar artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.

Yoshihisa Kotani1, Bryan W Cunningham, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Anton E Dmitriev, Niabin Hu, Manabu Ito, Yasuo Shikinami, Paul C McAfee, Akio Minami.   

Abstract

The in vitro multidirectional flexibility analysis was conducted to investigate the initial biomechanical effect of biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc replacement from either anterior or posterior approach in a cadaveric lumbosacral spine model. Two designs of anterior total and posterior subtotal artificial discs were developed using bioactive three-dimensional fabric and bioresorbable hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactide material (3DF disc). Both models were designed to obtain the stable interface bonding to vertebral endplates with maximum surface area occupation. Using seven cadaveric lumbosacral spines, the following three anterior reconstruction methods were sequentially performed at L4-5 level: anterior 3DF disc replacement; anterior BAK cages (BAK); and posterior pedicle screw fixation and anterior BAK cages combined (BAK + PS). The L2-3 level received two methods of posterior reconstructions: subtotal 3DF disc replacement (two implants), and posterior interbody cages and pedicle screw fixation (PLIF). Six unconstrained pure moments were applied and three-dimensional segmental motions were measured with an optoelectronic motion measurement system. The center of rotation (COR) calculation was conducted radiographically using flexion-extension films. Both anterior and posterior 3DF replacements statistically demonstrated equivalent range of motions (ROMs) in all loading modes compared to intact segment. Anterior BAK, BAK + PS, and PLIF demonstrated significantly lower ROMs when compared to intact and 3DF groups (P<0.05). The 3DF reconstruction tended to realign the COR to the posterior third or surrounding position at the operative disc level. The stand-alone lumbar 3DF disc replacement demonstrated biomechanical characteristics nearly equivalent to the intact spinal segments even through anterior or posterior approach in vitro, suggesting an excellent clinical potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16552532     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0086-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  Biomechanical and morphologic evaluation of a three-dimensional fabric sheep artificial intervertebral disc: in vitro and in vivo analysis.

Authors:  K Kadoya; Y Kotani; K Abumi; T Takada; N Shimamoto; Y Shikinami; T Kadosawa; K Kaneda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Artificial nucleus replacement: clinical experience.

Authors:  Peter M Klara; Charles D Ray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Design of an intervertebral disc prosthesis.

Authors:  T P Hedman; J P Kostuik; G R Fernie; W G Hellier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Materials and design concepts for an intervertebral disc spacer. II. Multidurometer composite design.

Authors:  M Vuono-Hawkins; N A Langrana; J R Parsons; C K Lee; M C Zimmerman
Journal:  J Appl Biomater       Date:  1995

5.  Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years.

Authors:  G Cinotti; T David; F Postacchini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanics of the SB Charité lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis.

Authors:  K Büttner-Janz; K Schellnack; H Zippel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint.

Authors:  B H Cummins; J T Robertson; S S Gill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients.

Authors:  W S Zeegers; L M Bohnen; M Laaper; M J Verhaegen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Vincent Pointillart; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  8 in total

1.  An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion.

Authors:  Donal McNally; Jason Naylor; Scott Johnson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of Intervertebral ROM in Multi-Level Cadaveric Lumbar Spines Using Distinct Pure Moment Loading Approaches.

Authors:  Brandon Santoni; Andres F Cabezas; Daniel J Cook; Matthew S Yeager; James B Billys; Benjamin Whiting; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

Review 4.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Stefan Midderhoff; Kyle Adkins; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12

8.  Investigation into Cervical Spine Biomechanics Following Single, Multilevel and Hybrid Disc Replacement Surgery with Dynamic Cervical Implant and Fusion: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Muzammil Mumtaz; Iman Zafarparandeh; Deniz Ufuk Erbulut
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.