Literature DB >> 447825

Manometry of the normal upper esophageal sphincter and its alterations in laryngectomy.

R W Welch, K Luckmann, P M Ricks, S T Drake, G A Gates.   

Abstract

Rapid pull-through pressure profiles of the normal human upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were simultaneously studied with a conventional three-orifice Honeywell solid-state probe, an eight lumen radially perfused (RP) probe, and a circumferentially sensitive (CS) probe designed to measure UES pressure (UESP) without regard to probe orientation. Pressure curves were digitized and analyzed by computer. The Honeywell probe recorded significantly lower peak pressures than the other two methods, and had wide intrasubject pressure variations (average coefficient of variation, 53%). In contrast, UESP measured with the CS probe was constant for each subject (mean peak UESP, 121 mm Hg; average coefficient of variation, 15%). Anteroposterior RP probe UESP were identical to CS probe pressures. Thus, peak perfused anteroposterior UESP correlates with circumferentially measured sphincter squeeze.Computer programs were written that allowed RP probe pressures to be mapped in three dimensions. Normal three-dimensional maps were characterized by anteroposterior accentuation of peak pressures and also by consistent axial asymmetry with anterior peak pressures occurring 0.8+/-0.2 cm closer to the pharynx. After defining the normal two- and three-dimensional UESP configuration, patients who had undergone laryngectomy were studied. Peak pressures measured with the RP probe decreased to congruent with50 mm Hg and radial pressure asymmetry vanished. Like normals, CS probe pressures corresponded to peak RP probe pressures. UES length did not change significantly. Three-dimensional mapping showed that axial asymmetry also vanished. It therefore appears that the anatomic alterations produced by laryngectomy abolishes UESP asymmetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 447825      PMCID: PMC372046          DOI: 10.1172/JCI109372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  5 in total

1.  A rapid pull-through technique for measuring lower esophageal sphincter pressure.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J J Stef; W N Miller; S B Lydon; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  IMPROVED TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING PLEURAL PRESSURE FROM ESOPHAGEAL BALLOONS.

Authors:  J MILIC-EMILI; J MEAD; J M TURNER; E M GLAUSER
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Criteria in the choice of an occluding cuff for the indirect measurement blood pressure.

Authors:  H Alexander; M L Cohen; L Steinfeld
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The pharyngoesophageal closure mechanism: a manometric study.

Authors:  C S Winans
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Manometry and electromyography of the upper esophageal sphincter in the opossum.

Authors:  R Asoh; R K Goyal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 22.682

  5 in total
  35 in total

1.  Evaluation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) using simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) and manometry.

Authors:  Larry S Miller; Qing Dai; Brett A Sweitzer; Vinod Thangada; Joseph K Kim; Beje Thomas; Henry Parkman; Ahmed M Soliman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  [High-resolution manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter].

Authors:  S Meyer; M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Graphical representation of eight-channel sphincter pressure profiles on a personal computer.

Authors:  T Dijkhuis; W A Bemelman; V P van der Hulst; P J Klopper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Interpretation of intraluminal manometric measurements in terms of swallowing mechanics.

Authors:  J G Brasseur; W J Dodds
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Characteristics of the propagating pressure wave in the esophagus.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; S J Bickston; S M Cohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Three-Dimensional Anorectal Manometry Findings in Primigravida.

Authors:  D P Wickramasinghe; C S Perera; H Senanayake; D N Samarasekera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Physiological substrates of normal deglutition.

Authors:  J G Kennedy; R D Kent
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Evaluation of pharyngeal dysphagia with manofluorography.

Authors:  F M McConnel; D Cerenko; T Hersh; L J Weil
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Quantifying contributions of the cricopharyngeus to upper esophageal sphincter pressure changes by means of intramuscular electromyography and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Michael J Hammer; Matthew R Hoffman; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  The Indian experience with immediate tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration.

Authors:  A R Mehta; S Sarkar; S A Mehta; G K Bachher
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.