Literature DB >> 15259487

Evaluation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) using simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) and manometry.

Larry S Miller1, Qing Dai, Brett A Sweitzer, Vinod Thangada, Joseph K Kim, Beje Thomas, Henry Parkman, Ahmed M Soliman.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize the motion, morphology, and pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). The UES and its surrounding structures were evaluated in seven normal subjects and four human cadavers, using simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography and manometry. The UES musculature on ultrasound is a C-shaped structure with an angle of 107 +/- 19 degrees. The mean peak resting UES pressure was 74 mm Hg, with a total cross-sectional area (CSA) of 0.87 +/- 0.33 cm2. During swallowing, the UES moved in an orad direction. Localizing the UES sonographically, the peak UES pressure in the cadavers was 19.7 +/- 10.0 mm Hg. The UES has a greater muscular CSA and resting pressure than the upper esophageal body. In the cadaver studies, the UES was imaged in conjunction with a significant increase in pressure, indicating that the pressure is due to passive mechanical conformational changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15259487     DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000030077.15625.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  16 in total

1.  COMPARISON OF THE ULTRASTRUCTURAL BASIS OF THE CONTRACTILE PROCESS IN HEART AND SKELETAL MUSCLE.

Authors:  D SPIRO; E H SONNENBLICK
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Determinants of upper esophageal sphincter pressure in dogs.

Authors:  P Jacob; P J Kahrilas; G Herzon; B McLaughlin
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-08

3.  Simultaneous endoluminal sonography and manometry to assess anal sphincter complex in normal subjects.

Authors:  R F Wong; E S Bonapace; C Y Chung; J B Liu; H P Parkman; L S Miller
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  The use of intraluminal manometry to assess upper esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  B T Massey
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Correlation of high-frequency esophageal ultrasonography and manometry in the study of esophageal motility.

Authors:  L S Miller; J B Liu; F P Colizzo; H Ter; J Marzano; C Barbarevech; K Helwig; L Leung; B B Goldberg; K ] Hedwig K [corrected to Helwig
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Use of simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) and manometry to characterize high pressure zone of distal esophagus.

Authors:  W H McCray; C Chung; H P Parkman; L S Miller
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Manometry of the normal upper esophageal sphincter and its alterations in laryngectomy.

Authors:  R W Welch; K Luckmann; P M Ricks; S T Drake; G A Gates
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Functional anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  D V Sivarao; R K Goyal
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-03-06       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Endoluminal ultrasonography: a new method to evaluate dysphagia.

Authors:  J Sobin; A Nathanson; C F Engström
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.538

View more
  7 in total

1.  Circular smooth muscle contributes to esophageal shortening during peristalsis.

Authors:  Anil K Vegesna; Keng-Yu Chuang; Ramashesai Besetty; Steven J Phillips; Alan S Braverman; Mary F Barbe; Michael R Ruggieri; Larry S Miller
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Anatomic-manometric correlation of the upper esophageal sphincter: a concurrent US and manometry study.

Authors:  Lyndon V Hernandez; Kulwinder S Dua; Sri Naveen Surapaneni; Tanya Rittman; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Botulinum Toxin Injection for the Treatment of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction.

Authors:  Pengxu Wei
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Transcutaneous cervical esophagus ultrasound in adults: relation with ambulatory 24-h pH-monitoring and esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Sabite Kacar; Selma Uysal; Sedef Kuran; Ulku Dagli; Yasemin Ozin; Erdem Karabulut; Nurgul Sasmaz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Ultrasound imaging of infant swallowing during breast-feeding.

Authors:  Donna T Geddes; Lynda M Chadwick; Jacqueline C Kent; Catherine P Garbin; Peter E Hartmann
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Acoustic study of pharyngeal swallowing as a function of the volume and consistency of the bolus.

Authors:  Karim Hammoudi; Michèle Boiron; Nadia Hernandez; Clément Bobillier; Sylvain Morinière
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Best Practices in Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Bonnie Martin-Harris; Cheri L Canon; Heather Shaw Bonilha; Joseph Murray; Kate Davidson; Maureen A Lefton-Greif
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.408

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.