Literature DB >> 8350841

Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.

R Havukainen1, M Pirinen.   

Abstract

Patient doses and image quality in five standard x-ray examination projections (22-36 measurements per each projection) have been measured, using homogeneous phantoms. The means and range of variation for the entrance skin air kerma values were: abdomen AP 5.2 mGy (1.1-21 mGy), chest PA 0.27 mGy (0.035-0.84 mGy), lumbar spine AP 8.4 mGy (2.9-28 mGy), skull LAT 3.1 mGy (1.1-7.7 mGy), and thoracic spine AP 7.9 mGy (1.3-22 mGy). Considerable variation was found in image quality parameters: film optical densities, image contrasts, and resolutions as well as in exposure values, tube voltages, exposure times, and in half-value thicknesses. The study indicated the need to standardize medical x-ray examination techniques in different x-ray departments. The measuring method can be used for comparing the patient dose and image quality of an individual x-ray unit to the doses and image quality in general use. The results can be used as the reference values for quality control of x-ray equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8350841     DOI: 10.1118/1.596987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Effective dose delivered by conventional radiology to Aosta Valley population between 2002 and 2009.

Authors:  F Zenone; S Aimonetto; P Catuzzo; A Peruzzo Cornetto; P Marchisio; M Natrella; A M Rosanò; T Meloni; M Pasquino; S Tofani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  A Almén; A Tingberg; J Besjakov; S Mattsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  New head equivalent phantom for task and image performance evaluation representative for neurovascular procedures occurring in the Circle of Willis.

Authors:  Ciprian N Ionita; Brendan Loughran; Amit Jain; S N Swetadri Vasan; Daniel R Bednarek; Elad Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Kenneth V Snyder; L N Hopkins; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-23

4.  The Accuracy of Plain Skull X-ray Examination as a Predictor of Recanalization Following Guglielmi Detachable Coil Embolisation in the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  G J Hwang; A Berenstein; Y Niimi; A Setton; J Pryor; G Baltsavias; R Albert; J Hartman
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Comparison of six phantoms for entrance skin dose evaluation in 11 standard X-ray examinations.

Authors:  Gaetano Compagnone; Laura Pagan; Carlo Bergamini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Local-Reference Patient Dose Evaluation in Conventional Radiography Examinations in Mazandaran, Iran.

Authors:  D Khoshdel-Navi; A Shabestani-Monfared; M R Deevband; R Abdi; M Nabahati
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2016-06-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.