Literature DB >> 8315155

Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise.

P A Howard-Jones1, S Rosen.   

Abstract

The ability of listeners to "glimpse" acoustic cues during the quieter sections of an interrupted noise has primarily been studied using maskers with interruptions occurring simultaneously across the entire frequency range of the masker--broadband comodulated interruptions. Here, the possibility of uncomodulated glimpsing (the glimpsing of acoustic cues separated both in time and frequency) was investigated. To achieve this, speech reception thresholds for a set of intervocalic consonants were adaptively measured in 100-Hz to 10-kHz pink noise divided into a varying number of frequency bands of equal energy. In uncomodulated noise conditions, the odd and even numbered bands were switched on and off alternately at a rate of 10 Hz. The spectrograms of such noises (on log frequency scales), resemble portions of a checkerboard. Glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise was found with maskers divided into two and four bands, but not into eight bands or more. Further investigations showed that, in the two-band case, this release from masking was indeed due to uncomodulated glimpsing, and not simply attributable to glimpsing in one of the modulated bands. In the four-band case, the release from masking in checkerboard noise can be accounted for without recourse to uncomodulated glimpsing. Interestingly, conditions which allowed glimpsing resulted in greater intersubject variability. The implications of these results for quantitative analyses of masker fluctuations are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315155     DOI: 10.1121/1.405811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition for multiple bands: Implications for the Speech Intelligibility Index.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Glimpsing speech in temporally and spectro-temporally modulated noise.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A modular high-density μECoG system on macaque vlPFC for auditory cognitive decoding.

Authors:  Chia-Han Chiang; Jaejin Lee; Charles Wang; Ashley J Williams; Timothy H Lucas; Yale E Cohen; Jonathan Viventi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Richard B Reilly; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.