Literature DB >> 17672662

Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise.

Ning Li1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

The idea that listeners are able to "glimpse" the target speech in the presence of competing noise has been supported by many studies, and is based on the assumption that listeners are able to glimpse pieces of the target speech occurring at different times and somehow patch them together to hear out the target speech. The factors influencing glimpsing in noise are not well understood and are examined in the present study. Specifically, the effects of the frequency location, spectral width, and duration of the glimpses are examined. Stimuli were constructed using an ideal time-frequency (T-F) masking technique that ensures that the target is stronger than the masker in certain T-F regions of the mixture, thereby rendering certain regions easier to glimpse than others. Sentences were synthesized using this technique with glimpse information placed in several frequency regions while varying the glimpse window duration and total duration of glimpsing. Results indicated that the frequency location and total duration of the glimpses had a significant effect on speech recognition, with the highest performance obtained when the listeners were able to glimpse information in the F1F2 frequency region (0-3 kHz) for at least 60% of the utterance.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672662      PMCID: PMC2678552          DOI: 10.1121/1.2749454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Speech segregation based on sound localization.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang; Guy J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral integration of synchronous and asynchronous cues to consonant identification.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch-based monaural segregation of reverberant speech.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation.

Authors:  Michael C Anzalone; Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The masking of speech.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Speech intelligibility in noise: relative contribution of speech elements above and below the noise level.

Authors:  R Drullman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise.

Authors:  P A Howard-Jones; S Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  41 in total

1.  The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Rithika Saripella; Philipos C Loizou; Linda Thibodeau; Jennifer A Alford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phonemic restoration effect reversed in a reverberant room.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of Place of Articulation for Plosives and Fricatives in Noise.

Authors:  Abeer Alwan; Jintao Jiang; Willa Chen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; René H Gifford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.