Literature DB >> 8312476

Excitatory signaling in bacterial probed by caged chemoeffectors.

S Khan1, F Castellano, J L Spudich, J A McCray, R S Goody, G P Reid, D R Trentham.   

Abstract

Chemotactic excitation responses to caged ligand photorelease of rapidly swimming bacteria that reverse (Vibrio alginolyticus) or tumble (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium) have been measured by computer. Mutants were used to assess the effects of abnormal motility behavior upon signal processing times and test feasibility of kinetic analyses of the signaling pathway in intact bacteria. N-1-(2-Nitrophenyl)ethoxycarbonyl-L-serine and 2-hydroxyphenyl 1-(2-nitrophenyl) ethyl phosphate were synthesized. These compounds are a 'caged' serine and a 'caged' proton and on flash photolysis release serine and protons and attractant and repellent ligands, respectively, for Tsr, the serine receptor. The product quantum yield for serine was 0.65 (+/- 0.05) and the rate of serine release was proportional to [H+] near-neutrality with a rate constant of 17 s-1 at pH 7.0 and 21 degrees C. The product quantum yield for protons was calculated to be 0.095 on 308-nm irradiation but 0.29 (+/- 0.02) on 300-350-nm irradiation, with proton release occurring at > 10(5) s-1. The pH jumps produced were estimated using pH indicators, the pH-dependent decay of the chromophoric aci-nitro intermediate and bioassays. Receptor deletion mutants did not respond to photorelease of the caged ligands. Population responses occurred without measurable latency. Response times increased with decreased stimulus strength. Physiological or genetic perturbation of motor rotation bias leading to increased tumbling reduced response sensitivity but did not affect response times. Exceptions were found. A CheR-CheB mutant strain had normal motility, but reduced response. A CheZ mutant had tumbly motility, reduced sensitivity, and increased response time to attractant, but a normal repellent response. These observations are consistent with current ideas that motor interactions with a single parameter, namely phosphorylated CheY protein, dictate motor response to both attractant and repellent stimuli. Inverse motility motor mutants with extreme rotation bias exhibited the greatest reduction in response sensitivity but, nevertheless, had normal attractant response times. This implies that control of CheY phosphate concentration rather than motor reactions limits responses to attractants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8312476      PMCID: PMC1225978          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81317-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  68 in total

Review 1.  Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins.

Authors:  J S Parkinson; E C Kofoid
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Proton concentration jumps and generation of transmembrane pH-gradients by photolysis of 4-formyl-6-methoxy-3-nitrophenoxyacetic acid.

Authors:  K Janko; J Reichert
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1987-12-11

3.  The proton flux through the bacterial flagellar motor.

Authors:  M Meister; G Lowe; H C Berg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Response of the flagellar rotary motor to abrupt changes in extracellular pH.

Authors:  K Shimada; H C Berg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J E Segall; S M Block; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Excitation signal processing times in Halobacterium halobium phototaxis.

Authors:  S A Sundberg; M Alam; J L Spudich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Reconstitution of signaling in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A J Wolfe; M P Conley; T J Kramer; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Inhibition of Escherichia coli chemotaxis by omega-conotoxin, a calcium ion channel blocker.

Authors:  L S Tisa; B M Olivera; J Adler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Calcium ions are involved in Escherichia coli chemotaxis.

Authors:  L S Tisa; J Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Salmonella typhimurium fliG and fliN mutations causing defects in assembly, rotation, and switching of the flagellar motor.

Authors:  V M Irikura; M Kihara; S Yamaguchi; H Sockett; R M Macnab
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  32 in total

1.  Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  R Jasuja; Y Lin; D R Trentham; S Khan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A nonlinear stimulus-response relation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A M Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.

Authors:  A Bren; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Characterization of a new caged proton capable of inducing large pH jumps.

Authors:  Andreas Barth; John E T Corrie
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The fast tumble signal in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Shahid Khan; Sanjay Jain; Gordon P Reid; David R Trentham
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Differential activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptors by blue-light stimuli.

Authors:  Stuart Wright; Bharat Walia; John S Parkinson; Shahid Khan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Self-assembly of receptor/signaling complexes in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Peter M Wolanin; Melinda D Baker; Noreen R Francis; Dennis R Thomas; David J DeRosier; Jeffry B Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Caged compounds: photorelease technology for control of cellular chemistry and physiology.

Authors:  Graham C R Ellis-Davies
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Single-cell E. coli response to an instantaneously applied chemotactic signal.

Authors:  Takashi Sagawa; Yu Kikuchi; Yuichi Inoue; Hiroto Takahashi; Takahiro Muraoka; Kazushi Kinbara; Akihiko Ishijima; Hajime Fukuoka
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.