Literature DB >> 10500179

Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis.

R Jasuja1, Y Lin, D R Trentham, S Khan.   

Abstract

Chemotaxis of enteric bacteria in spatial gradients toward a source of chemoattractant is accomplished by increases in the length of swimming runs up the gradient. Biochemical components of the intracellular signal pathway have been identified, but mechanisms for achieving the high response sensitivity remain unknown. Binding of attractant ligand to its receptor inactivates a receptor-associated histidine kinase, CheA, which phosphorylates the signal protein CheY. The reduction in phospho-CheY, CheY-P, levels prolongs swimming runs. Here, the stimulus-response relation has been determined by measurement of excitation responses mediated by the Tar receptor to defined concentration jumps of the attractant, aspartate, administered within milliseconds by photolysis of a photolabile precursor. The bacteria responded to <1% changes in Tar occupancy when adapted to aspartate over concentrations spanning three orders of magnitude. Response amplitudes increased approximately logarithmically with stimulus strength, extending responsiveness over a greater stimulus range. The extent and form of this relation indicates that, in contrast to mechanisms for adaptive recovery, excitation signal generation involves amplification based on cooperative interactions. These interactions could entail inactivation of multiple receptor-CheA signaling complexes and/or simultaneous activation of CheY-P dephosphorylation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10500179      PMCID: PMC18036          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Sensitivity, cooperativity and gain in chemotaxis signal transduction.

Authors:  J Stock
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J L Spudich; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Concentration correlation spectroscopy: a new biophysical probe based on occupation number fluctuations.

Authors:  E L Elson; W W Webb
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1975

4.  Physics of chemoreception.

Authors:  H C Berg; E M Purcell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Protein methylation in behavioural control mechanisms and in signal transduction.

Authors:  M S Springer; M F Goy; J Adler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. Weber law and related phenomena.

Authors:  R Mesibov; G W Ordal; J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H C Berg; P M Tedesco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  S M Block; J E Segall; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Chemotactic responses of Escherichia coli to small jumps of photoreleased L-aspartate.

Authors:  R Jasuja; J Keyoung; G P Reid; D R Trentham; S Khan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Membrane receptors for aspartate and serine in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  S Clarke; D E Koshland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1979-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  22 in total

1.  A nonlinear stimulus-response relation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A M Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cooperativity between bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Perfect and near-perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Behavioral responses of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to linear gradients of the nutrients succinate and acetate.

Authors:  H L Packer; J P Armitage
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads.

Authors:  Claudia A Studdert; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cooperativity in signal transfer through the Uhp system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Daniël T Verhamme; Pieter W Postma; Wim Crielaard; Klaas J Hellingwerf
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  The fast tumble signal in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Shahid Khan; Sanjay Jain; Gordon P Reid; David R Trentham
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Interdependence of behavioural variability and response to small stimuli in bacteria.

Authors:  Heungwon Park; William Pontius; Calin C Guet; John F Marko; Thierry Emonet; Philippe Cluzel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Continuous-flow capillary assay for measuring bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Aaron M J Law; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Conformational suppression of inter-receptor signaling defects.

Authors:  Peter Ames; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.