Literature DB >> 15189900

The fast tumble signal in bacterial chemotaxis.

Shahid Khan1, Sanjay Jain, Gordon P Reid, David R Trentham.   

Abstract

We have analyzed repellent signal processing in Escherichia coli by flash photorelease of leucine from photolabile precursors. We found that 1). response amplitudes of free-swimming cell populations increased with leucine jump concentration, with an apparent Hill coefficient of 1.3 and a half-maximal dose of 14.4 microM; 2). at a 0-0.5 mM leucine concentration jump sufficient to obtain a saturation motile response, the swimming cell response time of approximately 0.05 s was several-fold more rapid than the motor response time of 0.39 +/- 0.18 s measured by following the rotation of cells tethered by a single flagellum to quartz coverslips; and 3). the motor response time of individual cells was correlated with rotation bias but not cell size. These results provide information on amplification, rate-limiting step, and flagellar bundle mechanics during repellent signal processing. The difference between the half-maximal dose for the excitation response and the corresponding value reported for adaptation provides an estimate of the increase in the rate of formation of CheYP, the phosphorylated form of the signal protein CheY. The estimated increase gives a lower limit receptor kinase coupling ratio of 6.0. The magnitude and form of the motor response time distribution argue for it being determined by the poststimulus switching probability rather than CheYP turnover, diffusion, or binding. The temporal difference between the tethered and swimming cell response times to repellents can be quantitatively accounted for and suggests that one flagellum is sufficient to cause a measurable change of direction in which a bacterium swims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189900      PMCID: PMC1304305          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.033043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  42 in total

1.  Conformational spread in a ring of proteins: a stochastic approach to allostery.

Authors:  T A Duke; N Le Novère; D Bray
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  R Jasuja; Y Lin; D R Trentham; S Khan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  On bacterial tactic response times and latencies.

Authors:  S Khan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments.

Authors:  L Turner; W S Ryu; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Covalent modification regulates ligand binding to receptor complexes in the chemosensory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Li; R M Weis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.

Authors:  A Bren; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Two-component signal transduction.

Authors:  A M Stock; V L Robinson; P N Goudreau
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 23.643

9.  Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C Kim; M Jackson; R Lux; S Khan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Peter Ames; Claudia A Studdert; Rebecca H Reiser; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stochastic coordination of multiple actuators reduces latency and improves chemotactic response in bacteria.

Authors:  Michael W Sneddon; William Pontius; Thierry Emonet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptors by blue-light stimuli.

Authors:  Stuart Wright; Bharat Walia; John S Parkinson; Shahid Khan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  The relation of signal transduction to the sensitivity and dynamic range of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Toshinori Namba; Masatoshi Nishikawa; Tatsuo Shibata
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Enhancement of tunability of MAPK cascade due to coexistence of processive and distributive phosphorylation mechanisms.

Authors:  Jianqiang Sun; Ming Yi; Lijian Yang; Wenbin Wei; Yiming Ding; Ya Jia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Identification of an anchor residue for CheA-CheY interactions in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Hemang Thakor; Sarah Nicholas; Ian M Porter; Nicole Hand; Richard C Stewart
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Architecture and signal transduction mechanism of the bacterial chemosensory array: progress, controversies, and challenges.

Authors:  Joseph J Falke; Kene N Piasta
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Long-range signaling by phosphoprotein waves arising from bistability in protein kinase cascades.

Authors:  Nick I Markevich; Mikhail A Tsyganov; Jan B Hoek; Boris N Kholodenko
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Introducing simulated cellular architecture to the quantitative analysis of fluorescent microscopy.

Authors:  Mark A DePristo; Lynne Chang; Ronald D Vale; Shahid M Khan; Karen Lipkow
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.667

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.