Literature DB >> 3024160

Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis.

J E Segall, S M Block, H C Berg.   

Abstract

Responses of tethered cells of Escherichia coli to impulse, step, exponential-ramp or exponentiated sine-wave stimuli are internally consistent, provided that allowance is made for the nonlinear effect of thresholds. This result confirms that wild-type cells exposed to stimuli in the physiological range make short-term temporal comparisons extending 4 sec into the past: the past second is given a positive weighting, the previous 3 sec are given a negative weighting, and the cells respond to the difference. cheRcheB mutants (defective in methylation and demethylation) weight the past second in a manner similar to the wild type, but they do not make short-term temporal comparisons. When exposed to small steps delivered iontophoretically, they fail to adapt over periods of up to 12 sec; when exposed to longer steps in a flow cell, they partially adapt, but with a decay time of greater than 30 sec. cheZ mutants use a weighting that extends at least 40 sec into the past. The gain of the chemotactic system is large: the change in occupancy of one receptor molecule produces a significant response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3024160      PMCID: PMC387059          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J L Spudich; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Change in direction of flagellar rotation is the basis of the chemotactic response in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S H Larsen; R W Reader; E N Kort; W W Tso; J Adler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  R M Macnab; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking.

Authors:  H C Berg; D A Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Quantitative analysis of bacterial migration in chemotaxis.

Authors:  F W Dahlquist; P Lovely; D E Koshland
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1972-03-29

6.  A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-01

7.  Compensatory mutations in receptor function: a reevaluation of the role of methylation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J Stock; A Borczuk; F Chiou; J E Burchenal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H C Berg; P M Tedesco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Chemotaxis in bacteria.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D A Brown; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  180 in total

1.  Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  R Jasuja; Y Lin; D R Trentham; S Khan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A nonlinear stimulus-response relation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A M Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Bacterial chemotaxis and the question of gain.

Authors:  Dennis Bray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multi-stage regulation, a key to reliable adaptive biochemical pathways.

Authors:  G Almogy; L Stone; N Ben-Tal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cooperativity between bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Bacterial chemotaxis: a new player in response regulator dephosphorylation.

Authors:  John S Parkinson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  Microfluidic technologies for temporal perturbations of chemotaxis.

Authors:  Daniel Irimia
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  New motion analysis system for characterization of the chemosensory response kinetics of Rhodobacter sphaeroides under different growth conditions.

Authors:  Mila Kojadinovic; Antoine Sirinelli; George H Wadhams; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.