Literature DB >> 8296472

Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency.

J Rovamo1, O Luntinen, R Näsänen.   

Abstract

We modelled the human foveal visual system in a detection task as a simple image processor comprising (i) low-pass filtering due to the optical transfer function of the eye, (ii) high-pass filtering of neural origin, (iii) addition of internal neural noise, and (iv) detection by a local matched filter. Its detection efficiency for gratings was constant up to a critical area but then decreased with increasing area. To test the model we measured Michelson contrast sensitivity as a function of grating area at spatial frequencies of 0.125-32 c/deg for simple vertical and circular cosine gratings. In circular gratings luminance was sinusoidally modulated as a function of the radius of the grating field. In agreement with the model, contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies increased in proportion to the square-root of grating area at small areas. When grating area exceeded critical area, the increase saturated and contrast sensitivity became independent of area at large grating areas. Spatial integration thus obeyed Piper's law at small grating areas. The critical area of spatial integration, marking the cessation of Piper's law, was constant in solid degrees at low spatial frequencies but inversely proportional to spatial frequency squared at medium and high spatial frequencies. At low spatial frequencies the maximum contrast sensitivity obtainable by spatial integration increased in proportion to spatial frequency but at high spatial frequencies it decreased in proportion to the cube of the increasing spatial frequency. The increase was due to high-pass filtering of neural origin (lateral inhibition) and the decrease was mainly due to the optical transfer function of the eye. Our model explained 95% of the total variance of the contrast sensitivity data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8296472     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90235-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  Senescent changes in photopic spatial summation.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Senescence of spatial chromatic contrast sensitivity. II. Matching under natural viewing conditions.

Authors:  Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; Katsunori Okajima; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Functional evidence for cone-specific connectivity in the human retina.

Authors:  Chara Vakrou; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw; Declan McKeefry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.

Authors:  John M Foley; Srinivasa Varadharajan; Chin C Koh; Mylene C Q Farias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds.

Authors:  David L Leong; Louise Rainford; Tamara Miner Haygood; Gary J Whitman; Philip M Tchou; William R Geiser; Selin Carkaci; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Spatial visual filtering in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nigel Philip Davies; Antony Bryan Morland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Contrast response functions in the visual wulst of the alert burrowing owl: a single-unit study.

Authors:  Pedro Gabrielle Vieira; João Paulo Machado de Sousa; Jerome Baron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural correlates of stimulus spatial frequency-dependent contrast detection.

Authors:  Jianjun Meng; Ruilong Liu; Ke Wang; Tianmiao Hua; Zhong-Lin Lu; Minmin Xi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Robert J Summers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.