Literature DB >> 27466135

Contrast response functions in the visual wulst of the alert burrowing owl: a single-unit study.

Pedro Gabrielle Vieira1, João Paulo Machado de Sousa2, Jerome Baron3.   

Abstract

The neuronal representation of luminance contrast has not been thoroughly studied in birds. Here we present a detailed quantitative analysis of the contrast response of 120 individual neurons recorded from the visual wulst of awake burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia). Stimuli were sine-wave gratings presented within the cell classical receptive field and optimized in terms of eye preference, direction of drift, and spatiotemporal frequency. As contrast intensity was increased from zero to near 100%, most cells exhibited a monotonic response profile with a compressive, at times saturating, nonlinearity at higher contrasts. However, contrast response functions were found to have a highly variable shape across cells. With the view to capture a systematic trend in the data, we assessed the performance of four plausible models (linear, power, logarithmic, and hyperbolic ratio) using classical goodness-of-fit measures and more rigorous statistical tools for multimodel inferences based on the Akaike information criterion. From this analysis, we conclude that a high degree of model uncertainty is present in our data, meaning that no single descriptor is able on its own to capture the heterogeneous nature of single-unit contrast responses in the wulst. We further show that the generalizability of the hyperbolic ratio model established, for example, in the primary visual cortex of cats and monkeys is not tenable in the owl wulst mainly because most neurons in this area have a much wider dynamic range that starts at low contrast. The challenge for future research will be to understand the functional implications of these findings.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast processing; model selection; owls; visual wulst

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27466135      PMCID: PMC5144686          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00505.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  130 in total

1.  Effects of search efficiency on surround suppression during visual selection in frontal eye field.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Takashi R Sato; Kirk G Thompson; Amanda A Vaughn; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells.

Authors:  D J Heeger
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Population imaging of ongoing neuronal activity in the visual cortex of awake rats.

Authors:  David S Greenberg; Arthur R Houweling; Jason N D Kerr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex.

Authors:  D G Albrecht; W S Geisler
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Neural connections of the "visual wulst" of the avian telencephalon. Experimental studies in the piegon (Columba livia) and owl (Speotyto cunicularia).

Authors:  H J Karten; W Hodos; W J Nauta; A M Revzin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Adaptation to spatial stimuli.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Visual effects of lesions of cortical area V2 in macaques.

Authors:  W H Merigan; T A Nealey; J H Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Motion sensitivity in the nucleus of the basal optic root of the pigeon.

Authors:  F Wolf-Oberhollenzer; K Kirschfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A neurophysiological determination of the vertical horopter in the cat and owl.

Authors:  M L Cooper; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1979-03-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  The potential importance of saturating and supersaturating contrast response functions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.