Literature DB >> 19757916

Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.

Tim S Meese1, Robert J Summers.   

Abstract

We assessed summation of contrast across eyes and area at detection threshold (C(t)). Stimuli were sine-wave gratings (2.5 c/deg) spatially modulated by cosine- and anticosine-phase raised plaids (0.5 c/deg components oriented at +/-45 degrees ). When presented dichoptically the signal regions were interdigitated across eyes but produced a smooth continuous grating following their linear binocular sum. The average summation ratio (C(t1)/([C(t1+2)]) for this stimulus pair was 1.64 (4.3 dB). This was only slightly less than the binocular summation found for the same patch type presented to both eyes, and the area summation found for the two different patch types presented to the same eye. We considered 192 model architectures containing each of the following four elements in all possible orders: (i) linear summation or a MAX operator across eyes, (ii) linear summation or a MAX operator across area, (iii) linear or accelerating contrast transduction, and (iv) additive Gaussian, stochastic noise. Formal equivalences reduced this to 62 different models. The most successful four-element model was: linear summation across eyes followed by nonlinear contrast transduction, linear summation across area, and late noise. Model performance was enhanced when additional nonlinearities were placed before binocular summation and after area summation. The implications for models of probability summation and uncertainty are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757916      PMCID: PMC2807356          DOI: 10.1167/9.4.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  22 in total

1.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation.

Authors:  C W Tyler; C C Chen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson; Daniel H Baker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Contrast masking in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-12

6.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field.

Authors:  J G Robson; N Graham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection.

Authors:  D J Lasley; T E Cohn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Probability summation over time.

Authors:  A B Watson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.

Authors:  D H Baker; T S Meese; R J Summers
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-01-02

4.  A common rule for integration and suppression of luminance contrast across eyes, space, time, and pattern.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Daniel H Baker
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-01-02

5.  A reevaluation of achromatic spatio-temporal vision: Nonoriented filters are monocular, they adapt, and can be used for decision making at high flicker speeds.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Daniel H Baker
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-06-21

6.  The effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Stuart A Wallis; Mark A Georgeson; Tim S Meese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Orientation tuning of binocular summation: a comparison of colour to achromatic contrast.

Authors:  Mina Gheiratmand; Avital S Cherniawsky; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Orientation tuning in human colour vision at detection threshold.

Authors:  Mina Gheiratmand; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Grid-texture mechanisms in human vision: Contrast detection of regular sparse micro-patterns requires specialist templates.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.