Literature DB >> 25391301

The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision.

Fang Hou1, Zhong-Lin Lu2, Chang-Bing Huang3.   

Abstract

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), a measure of visual sensitivity to a wide range of spatial frequencies, has been widely used as the gain profile of the front-end filter of the visual system to predict how we perceive spatial patterns. However, the CSF itself is determined by the gain profile and other processing inefficiencies of the visual system; it may be problematic to use the CSF as the gain profile in observer models. Here, we applied the external noise paradigm and the perceptual template model (PTM) to characterize several major properties of the visual system. With the external noise normalized gain profile, nonlinearity, and internal additive and multiplicative noises, the PTM accounted for 92.8% of the variance in the experiment data measured in a wide range of conditions and revealed the major processing components that determine the CSF. Unlike the CSF, the external noise normalized gain profile of the visual system is relatively flat across a wide range of spatial frequencies. The results may have major implications for understanding normal and abnormal spatial vision.
© 2014 ARVO.

Keywords:  channel; contrast sensitivity function; gain; noise; perceptual template model; spatial frequency; spatial vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25391301      PMCID: PMC4528485          DOI: 10.1167/14.13.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  57 in total

1.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Theoretical limits to visual performance.

Authors:  J Schwiegerling
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 3.  Contrast sensitivity and functional vision.

Authors:  Arthur P Ginsburg
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2003

4.  Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xin Hong; Arthur Bradley; Xu Cheng
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual detection of spatial contrast patterns: evaluation of five simple models.

Authors:  A B Watson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2000-01-03       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors.

Authors:  Xiangrui Li; Zhong-Lin Lu; Pengjing Xu; Jianzhong Jin; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  J T Wilensky; A Hawkins
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

9.  The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification.

Authors:  Najib J Majaj; Denis G Pelli; Peri Kurshan; Melanie Palomares
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Noise provides new insights on contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Ge Chen; Fang Hou; Fang-Fang Yan; Pan Zhang; Jie Xi; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Luis Lesmes; Peter Bex; Michael Dorr; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  TuebingenCSTest - a useful method to assess the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tim Schilling; Arne Ohlendorf; Alexander Leube; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Bayesian adaptive assessment of the reading function for vision: The qReading method.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Yukai Zhao; Luis Andres Lesmes; Peter Bex; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Comparing Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Functions Measured With Digit and Grating Stimuli.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Menglu Shen; Xianghang He; Rong Cui; Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  A hierarchical Bayesian approach to adaptive vision testing: A case study with the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Hairong Gu; Woojae Kim; Fang Hou; Luis Andres Lesmes; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jay I Myung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Chenxiao Wang; Rong Cui; Xianghang He; Menglu Shen; Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jia Qu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Defective Temporal Window of the Foveal Visual Processing in High Myopia.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Xiaoxiao Ying; Xianghang He; Jia Qu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Evaluating the performance of the quick CSF method in detecting contrast sensitivity function changes.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Luis Andres Lesmes; Woojae Kim; Hairong Gu; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal Characteristics of Visual Processing in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Xia Hu; Yi Qin; Xiaoxiao Ying; Junli Yuan; Rong Cui; Xiaowei Ruan; Xianghang He; Zhong-Lin Lu; Fan Lu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.