Literature DB >> 8296466

Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space.

F H Previc1, J L Blume.   

Abstract

Feature-conjunction search performance was investigated as a function of the target's location in three-dimensional (3-D) space. Ten subjects viewed a display that contained 36 shapes, one of which was the target. The targets were presented in one of four quadrants, three depths, and three eccentricities. On a given trial, nontarget distractor shapes were presented at the other 35 locations. The ability to find a target shape was best when it was presented in the upper and right visual fields and was closest to the fixation point in both its depth and eccentricity. These nonuniformities may be partly derived from the link between visual search and an extrapersonal attentional mechanism.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8296466     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90229-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Differential neurodynamics and connectivity in the dorsal and ventral visual pathways during perception of emotional crowds and individuals: a MEG study.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Cody A Cushing; Noreen Ward; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency.

Authors:  T C Handy; A Kingstone; G R Mangun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

4.  Asymmetry in Gaze Direction Discrimination Between the Upper and Lower Visual Fields.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Representational momentum reveals visual anticipation differences in the upper and lower visual fields.

Authors:  Victoria M Gottwald; Gavin P Lawrence; Amy E Hayes; Michael A Khan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.

Authors:  Alison R Lane; Keira Ball; Daniel T Smith; Thomas Schenk; Amanda Ellison
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Lateralized Suppression of Alpha-Band EEG Activity As a Mechanism of Target Processing.

Authors:  Felix Bacigalupo; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Emotion separation is completed early and it depends on visual field presentation.

Authors:  Lichan Liu; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Catherine E Craver-Lemley
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Diagnostic features of emotional expressions are processed preferentially.

Authors:  Elisa Scheller; Christian Büchel; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.