Literature DB >> 25929553

Representational momentum reveals visual anticipation differences in the upper and lower visual fields.

Victoria M Gottwald1, Gavin P Lawrence, Amy E Hayes, Michael A Khan.   

Abstract

Recent empirical research has revealed differences in functional capacity between the upper and lower visual fields (VFs), with the lower VF exhibiting superiority in visual perception skills. Similarly, functional differences between the left and right hemispheres elicit a predominance for visuospatial processing in the left visual field (left VF). Both anatomical as well as evolutionary arguments have been adopted in accounting for these variations in function. Preceding upper and lower VF research has typically investigated either static stimulus perception or the visual processing of upper limb action. The aim of the current research was to investigate whether the lower VF benefits associated with limb control transcend to visual anticipation (the perception of motion). Methods were based on Khan and Lawrence (Exp Brain Res 164:395-398, 2005), who investigated upper/lower VF differences in visuomotor control, but utilising a representational momentum paradigm to isolate perceptual processes. Thirty-two participants were randomised into either a left or right VF group and completed a perceptual computer-based task in the upper and lower VF, where they were required to judge the final position of a moving object before it disappeared. Two aspects of the distributions of same responses were then analysed; the central tendency (weighted means) and the variability. Results revealed that in the left VF, weighted means for the lower VF were significantly greater than for the upper VF [t(14) = 2.242, p = 0.042]. In both left and right VFs, variability was greater in the upper compared to lower VF. This provides new findings regarding visual processes in the different visual fields. While visual search and large scene perception has been found to be superior in the upper VF, here we find that visual anticipation, like target-directed visuomotor skill, is superior in the lower VF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929553     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4294-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Anticipation of action intentions in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Matthew Hudson; Hollie G Burnett; Tjeerd Jellema
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-08

2.  A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision.

Authors:  Olav Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual processing time differences owing to visual field asymmetries.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

Review 5.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions.

Authors:  Karl Verfaillie; Géry d'Ydewalle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The effect of attention on phenomenal length.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; A Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Representing statics as forces in equilibrium.

Authors:  J J Freyd; T M Pantzer; J L Cheng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

10.  Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory.

Authors:  R A Finke; J J Freyd; G C Shyi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.