Literature DB >> 18577285

Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects.

Anna M Barrett1, Catherine E Craver-Lemley.   

Abstract

Healthy subjects demonstrate leftward bias on visual-spatial tasks. However, young controls may also be left-biased when drawing communicatively, depicting the subject of a sentence leftward on a page relative to the sentence object, that is, a spatial-syntactic, implicit task. A leftward visual-spatial bias may decrease with aging, as right-hemisphere, dorsal, visual-spatial activation may be reduced in elderly subjects performing these tasks. We compared horizontal and radial (near-far) visual spatial bias, and spatial-syntactic bias, in healthy young and aged participants. Both horizontal and radial visual-spatial bias were smaller in aged participants when explicitly, but not implicitly assessed. Mean implicit far bias was greater in aged subjects, although this varied by task. We observed less implicit, spatial-syntactic left bias in aged than young participants. These results may be consistent with relatively less dominance of right hemisphere, dorsal spatial systems with aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18577285      PMCID: PMC2562288          DOI: 10.1017/S1355617708080764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  18 in total

1.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.

Authors:  G Jewell; M E McCourt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Spatial bias: effects of early reading direction on Korean subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; Manho Kim; Gregory P Crucian; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Language and space: some interactions.

Authors:  A Chatterjee
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Hemispheric asymmetry and aging: right hemisphere decline or asymmetry reduction.

Authors:  Florin Dolcos; Heather J Rice; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors?

Authors:  Peter H Weiss; John C Marshall; Karl Zilles; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Far bias on the radial line bisection task: measuring perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in normal subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; J Brent Crosson; Gregory P Crucian; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect.

Authors:  R Tegnér; M Levander
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Analogical representation and language structure.

Authors:  G Geminiani; E Bisiach; A Berti; M L Rusconi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Diagonal spatial neglect.

Authors:  V W Mark; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: an analysis of line bisection.

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; M I Posner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  17 in total

1.  Line copying: distinct "where" and "aiming" spatial bias in healthy adults.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah; Keith O Gonzalez; A M Barrett
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Imagery Interference Diminishes in Older Adults: Age-Related Differences in the Magnitude of the Perky Effect.

Authors:  Catherine Craver-Lemley; Robert F Bornstein; Danielle N Alexander; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Imagin Cogn Pers       Date:  2009

3.  Asymmetrical effects of adaptation to left- and right-shifting prisms depends on pre-existing attentional biases.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Andrew Leblanc; Sen-Wei Tsai; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Leonardo Iaccarino; Marco La Marra; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo De Luca; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Exploratory examination of lexical and neuroanatomic correlates of neglect dyslexia.

Authors:  Olga Boukrina; Peii Chen; Tamara Budinoska; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Spatial bias and right hemisphere function: sex-specific changes with aging.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Kelly M Goedert; Elizabeth Murray; Karen Kelly; Shpresa Ahmeti; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Decreased leftward 'aiming' motor-intentional spatial cuing in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daymond Wagner; Paul J Eslinger; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The relevance of aging-related changes in brain function to rehabilitation in aging-related disease.

Authors:  Bruce Crosson; Keith M McGregor; Joe R Nocera; Jonathan H Drucker; Stella M Tran; Andrew J Butler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Gregor Thut; Ashley Grant; Monika Harvey
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Midline Body Actions and Leftward Spatial "Aiming" in Patients with Spatial Neglect.

Authors:  Amit Chaudhari; Kara Pigott; A M Barrett
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.