Literature DB >> 8934691

Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency.

T C Handy1, A Kingstone, G R Mangun.   

Abstract

Studies of the spatial distribution of visual attention have shown that attentional facilitation monotonically decreases in a graded fashion with increasing distance from an attended location. However, reaction time (RT) measures have typically shown broader gradients than have signal detection (SD) measures of perceptual sensitivity. It is not clear whether these differences have arisen because the stages of information processing indexed by RT measures are different from those indexed by SD measures, or whether these differences are due to methodological confounds in the SD studies. In the present set of experiments, the spatial distribution of attention was studied by using a luminance detection task in an endogenous cuing paradigm that was designed to permit accurate calculations of SD and RT measures for targets at cued and uncued locations. Subjects made target-present/absent decisions at one of six possible cued or uncued upper visual hemifield locations on each trial. The results from three experiments suggest that the differences between broad and focal attentional distributions are not the result of different stages of information processing indexed by RT measures as opposed to SD measures. Rather, the differing distributions appear to reflect variations in attentional allocation strategies induced by the perceptual requirements typical of RT paradigms as opposed to SD paradigms. These findings support numerous prior studies showing that spatial attention affects perceptual sensitivity and that the strategic allocation of attention is a highly flexible process.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934691     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  43 in total

1.  Splitting focal attention.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Monitoring the visual world: hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun; S J Luck; R Plager; W Loftus; S A Hillyard; T Handy; V P Clark; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Covert visual orienting: hemifield-activation can be mimicked by zoom lens and midlocation placement strategies.

Authors:  R Klein; P McCormick
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1989-05

4.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: an attentional range effect.

Authors:  D LaBerge; V Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

5.  The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention.

Authors:  H J Müller; J M Findlay
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-10

7.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.

Authors:  G Tassinari; S Aglioti; L Chelazzi; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: an electrophysiological analysis.

Authors:  H J Heinze; S J Luck; T F Münte; A Gös; G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-07

9.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  11 in total

1.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.

Authors:  J-M Hopf; C N Boehler; S J Luck; J K Tsotsos; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Distortions of auditory space during rapid head turns.

Authors:  Joel Cooper; Simon Carlile; David Alais
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Preparatory Encoding of the Fine Scale of Human Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Jason Samaha; Camarin E Rolle; Zachery Greenberg; Navdeep Gill; Shai Porat; Tahim Kader; Sabahat Rahman; Rick Malzyner; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Modulation of the contrast response function by electrical microstimulation of the macaque frontal eye field.

Authors:  Leeland B Ekstrom; Pieter R Roelfsema; John T Arsenault; Hauke Kolster; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Dyslexic Readers Improve without Training When Using a Computer-Guided Reading Strategy.

Authors:  Reinhard Werth
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-21

8.  Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Michael J Seay; Danielle R Charney; John L Holmes; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The spread of presaccadic attention depends on the spatial configuration of the visual scene.

Authors:  Martin Szinte; Michael Puntiroli; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reducing Spatial Uncertainty Through Attentional Cueing Improves Contrast Sensitivity in Regions of the Visual Field With Glaucomatous Defects.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.