Literature DB >> 28056652

Asymmetry in Gaze Direction Discrimination Between the Upper and Lower Visual Fields.

Adam Palanica1, Roxane J Itier1.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that gaze direction can only be accurately discriminated within parafoveal limits (∼5° eccentricity) along the horizontal visual field. Beyond this eccentricity, head orientation seems to influence gaze discrimination more than iris cues. The present study examined gaze discrimination performance in the upper visual field (UVF) and lower visual field (LVF), and whether head orientation affects gaze judgments beyond parafoveal vision. Direct and averted gaze faces, in frontal and deviated head orientations, were presented for 150 ms along the vertical meridian while participants maintained central fixation during gaze discrimination judgments. Gaze discrimination was above chance level at all but one eccentricity for the two gaze-head congruent conditions. In contrast, for the incongruent conditions, gaze was discriminated above chance only from -1.5° to +3°, with an asymmetry between the UVF and LVF. Beyond foveal vision, response rates were biased toward head orientation rather than iris eccentricity, occurring in the LVF for both head orientations, and in the UVF for frontal head views. These findings suggest that covert processing of gaze direction involves the integration of eyes and head cues, with congruency of these two social cues driving response differences between the LVF and the UVF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  covert attention; face perception; gaze discrimination; spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28056652      PMCID: PMC5479698          DOI: 10.1177/0301006616686989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  60 in total

1.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron; Joanna C Tai; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention.

Authors:  W HERON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-03

4.  Fixation to features and neural processing of facial expressions in a gender discrimination task.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  The effect of face eccentricity on the perception of gaze direction.

Authors:  Dejan Todorović
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Vertical bias in neglect: a question of time?

Authors:  Dario Cazzoli; Thomas Nyffeler; Christian W Hess; René M Müri
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Effects of Peripheral Eccentricity and Head Orientation on Gaze Discrimination.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Authors:  E Làdavas; M Carletti; G Gori
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Psychophysics of perceiving eye-gaze and head direction with peripheral vision: implications for the dynamics of eye-gaze behavior.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; Jonathan W Kelly; Matthias Pusch; Jeremy N Bailenson; Andrew C Beall
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Attention Capture by Direct Gaze is Robust to Context and Task Demands.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2012-06-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Gaze-cued shifts of attention and microsaccades are sustained for whole bodies but are transient for body parts.

Authors:  Nicole X Han; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.