Literature DB >> 8293375

Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario.

N A Iscoe1, V Goel, K Wu, G Fehringer, E J Holowaty, C D Naylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the extent of variation by county and hospital in the use of breast-conserving surgery in the initial management of breast cancer and to assess some factors that might explain the observed variation.
DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Ontario. PATIENTS: All women with breast cancer newly diagnosed from Jan. 1, 1989, to Dec. 31, 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of women undergoing unilateral breast cancer surgery who had breast-conserving surgery in each hospital and county.
RESULTS: Of the 14,570 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer 12,815 (88.0%) underwent unilateral breast cancer surgery. The mean proportion of breast-conserving procedures by county was 52% and ranged from 11% to 84%. The proportion of breast-conserving procedures in individual hospitals with one or more cases of breast cancer per month ranged from 6% to 84%. The variations in the rates between hospitals was greater than that expected by chance alone (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: There was marked variation at the hospital and county level in the use of breast-conserving surgery in the initial management of breast cancer. This variation was strongly associated with the hospital where the surgery was performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8293375      PMCID: PMC1486167     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  5 in total

1.  Cancer registration in Ontario: a computer approach.

Authors:  E A Clarke; L D Marrett; N Kreiger
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1991

2.  Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services?

Authors:  L L Leape; R E Park; D H Solomon; M R Chassin; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Farrow; W C Hunt; J M Samet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; R Margolese; R Poisson; Y Pilch; C Redmond; E Fisher; N Wolmark; M Deutsch; E Montague
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  23 in total

Review 1.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

Authors:  C Charles; T Whelan; A Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Enthusiasm or uncertainty: small area variations in the use of mammography services in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  V Goel; K Iron; J I Williams
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Evidence-based Medicine:: An overview.

Authors:  K Bhargava; R Jaeschke
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2001-10

Review 4.  Palliative therapies in elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  F Porzsolt; J Zeeh; D Platt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Breast cancer prevention and control among the medically underserved.

Authors:  J F Kerner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A breast cancer care report card. An assessment of performance and a pursuit of value.

Authors:  J G West; M L Sutherland; J S Link; D A Margileth
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-04

7.  Was breast conserving surgery underutilized for early stage breast cancer? Instrumental variables evidence for stage II patients from Iowa.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Shane D Scott; Shari S Chen-Hardee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Practice patterns in breast cancer surgery: Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Porter; Heather McMulkin-Tait
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Perceptions of health care providers concerning patient and health care provider strategies to limit out-of-pocket costs for cancer care.

Authors:  M Mathews; S Buehler; R West
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Quality of life after breast cancer surgery with or without reconstruction.

Authors:  Demetris Stavrou; Oren Weissman; Anna Polyniki; Neofytos Papageorgiou; Joseph Haik; Nimrod Farber; Eyal Winkler
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.