Literature DB >> 14727779

Was breast conserving surgery underutilized for early stage breast cancer? Instrumental variables evidence for stage II patients from Iowa.

John M Brooks1, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Shane D Scott, Shari S Chen-Hardee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the average survival effects of breast conserving surgery plus irradiation relative to mastectomy for marginal stage II breast cancer patients in Iowa from 1989-1994. DATA SOURCES/DATA
SETTING: Secondary linked Iowa SEER Cancer Registry--Iowa Hospital Association discharge abstract data for women in Iowa with stage II breast cancer from 1989-1994. STUDY
DESIGN: Observational instrumental variables (IV) analysis. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Women with stage II breast cancer from the Iowa SEER Cancer Registry 1989-1994 who received all of their inpatient care in Iowa were linked with their respective hospital discharge abstracts. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Breast conserving surgery plus irradiation decreased survival relative to mastectomy for marginal stage II breast cancer patients in Iowa during the early 1990s. In this study marginal patients were those whose surgery choices were affected by differences in area treatment rates and access to radiation facilities.
CONCLUSIONS: If marginal patients are representative of patients whose treatment choices would be affected by changes in treatment rates, an increase in the breast conserving surgery plus irradiation rate for stage II early stage breast cancer patients would have decreased survival in Iowa during the early 1990s. Further research with newer data and broader samples is needed to make more current and specific assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14727779      PMCID: PMC1360955          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  31 in total

1.  Overview of the special supplement issue.

Authors:  M B McClellan; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Measuring and predicting surgeons' practice styles for breast cancer treatment in older women.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; C D Berg; N J Meropol; S B Edge; K Gold; Y T Hwang; J Hadley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Accuracy and completeness of Medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  X Du; J L Freeman; J L Warren; A B Nattinger; D Zhang; J S Goodwin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns among older women with breast cancer: an HMO and fee-for-service comparison.

Authors:  G F Riley; A L Potosky; C N Klabunde; J L Warren; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Factors influencing choice between mastectomy and lumpectomy for women in the Carolinas.

Authors:  S Benedict; D J Cole; L Baron; P Baron
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  The marginal benefits of invasive treatments for acute myocardial infarction: does insurance coverage matter?

Authors:  J M Brooks; M McClellan; H S Wong
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Effectiveness of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer in the elderly: instrumental variable and propensity analysis.

Authors:  C C Earle; J S Tsai; R D Gelber; M C Weinstein; P J Neumann; J C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Factors influencing a woman's choice to undergo breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy.

Authors:  R J Nold; R L Beamer; S D Helmer; M F McBoyle
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Information gained from linking SEER Cancer Registry Data to state-level hospital discharge abstracts. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.

Authors:  J M Brooks; E Chrischilles; S Scott; J Ritho; S Chen-Hardee
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  33 in total

1.  Effect of dialysis center profit-status on patient survival: a comparison of risk-adjustment and instrumental variable approaches.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Christopher P Irwin; Lawrence G Hunsicker; Michael J Flanigan; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane F Pendergast
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Philip S Wang; Daniel H Solomon; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  Estimating the effect of smoking cessation on weight gain: an instrumental variable approach.

Authors:  Daniel Eisenberg; Brian C Quinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  When and how to use instrumental variables in palliative care research.

Authors:  Joan D Penrod; Nathan E Goldstein; Partha Deb
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Effect of evidence-based acute pain management practices on inpatient costs.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Marita G Titler; Gail Ardery; Keela Herr
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The use of linear instrumental variables methods in health services research and health economics: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; W David Bradford; Clara E Dismuke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Til Stürmer; Robert J Glynn; Jeremy Rassen; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Estimating Decision-Relevant Comparative Effects Using Instrumental Variables.

Authors:  Anirban Basu
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2011-09

9.  Preference-based instrumental variable methods for the estimation of treatment effects: assessing validity and interpreting results.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  Validation of disability status, a claims-based measure of functional status for cancer treatment and outcomes studies.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Lisa D Gardner; Ilene H Zuckerman; Franklin Hendrick; Xuehua Ke; Martin J Edelman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.