Literature DB >> 14639490

Practice patterns in breast cancer surgery: Canadian perspective.

Geoffrey A Porter1, Heather McMulkin-Tait.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a common disease, and the surgical management is continually evolving. The objective of this study was to describe the current breast cancer practice patterns among Canadian surgeons. All active General Surgeons (n=1172), as accredited by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, were sent a 31-item questionnaire. Anonymous responses were collected and analyzed regarding surgeon demographics, practice, and perceptions regarding surgical care of breast cancer patients. Overall 640 active surgeons responded; of these, 519 (81%) treated breast cancer and formed the study cohort. Practice settings included community (55%), community with university affiliation (28%), and academic (17%). The majority of surgeons (76%) stated that <25% of their practice was devoted to breast disease, and 42% performed < or =2 breast cancer operations/month. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) was used by 57% of surgeons. On multivariate analysis, higher surgeon volume of breast cancer cases (p=0.0008), fellowship training in Surgical Oncology (p=0.009), community population (p=0.001), and academic practice setting (p<0.0001) were independently associated with the use of IBR. Of the 640 surgeons who responded, 79% stated that breast cancer surgery should be performed by "most general surgeons." In Canada, most breast cancer surgery was performed by general surgeons who did not appear to have an interest, as defined by training or clinical volume, in breast cancer. Although variability regarding specific surgical issues was found among subgroups of surgeons, the majority of respondents felt that most general surgeons should treat breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14639490     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-003-7040-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  43 in total

1.  Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; H Putter; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  M Morrow; S K Scott; H R Menck; T A Mustoe; D P Winchester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; C Brambilla; L Ferrari; A Moliterni; M Terenziani; M Zambetti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomized trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland.

Authors:  C R Gillis; D J Hole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-20

Review 9.  Lymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  C E Cox; F Haddad; S Bass; J M Cox; N N Ku; C Berman; A R Shons; T Yeatman; S Pendas; D S Reintgen
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.990

10.  Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer.

Authors:  D Sarrazin; M G Lê; R Arriagada; G Contesso; F Fontaine; M Spielmann; F Rochard; T Le Chevalier; J Lacour
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Effectiveness of Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Programs Utilizing Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model.

Authors:  Jory S Simpson; A S Scheer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Surgical resident experience in breast disease: a national study.

Authors:  Tulin Cil; Frances Wright; Claire M B Holloway
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The use of stereotactic excisional biopsy in the management of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Waël C Hanna; Sebastian V Demyttenaere; Lorenzo E Ferri; David M Fleiszer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Quality of diagnosis and surgical management of breast lesions in a community hospital: room for improvement?

Authors:  Catherine Hanley; Robert Kessaram
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Rates of breast cancer surgery in Canada from 2007/08 to 2009/10: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Geoff Porter; Brandon Wagar; Heather Bryant; Maria Hewitt; Elaine Wai; Kelly Dabbs; Anne McFarlane; Rami Rahal
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-06-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.